Skip to main content

Table 3 Relative size of anti-EGFR mAb efficacy for PIK3CA mutant tumors compared to PIK3CA wild-type tumors. Results stratified by anti-EGFR drug and line of therapy

From: Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Subgroup

PFS

P value for interaction*

OS

P value for interaction*

 

N Trials

Interaction Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

Interaction

P value

N Trials

Interaction Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

Interaction

P value

Anti-EGFR drug

   

0.53

   

0.70

 Cetuximab

2

1.26 (0.77, 2.04)

0.36

 

2

1.00 (0.59, 1.70)

0.99

 

 Panitumumab

2

1.71 (0.75, 3.92)

0.21

 

1

1.21 (0.53, 2.77)

0.66

 

Line of therapy

   

0.59

   

0.87

 First

1

1.50 (0.86, 2.60)

0.15

 

1

1.10 (0.58, 2.06)

0.77

 

  ≥ Second

3

1.19 (0.62, 2.26)

0.60

 

2

1.02 (0.55, 1.91)

0.95

 
  1. *Test comparing the HRs between trial subgroups (cetuximab; panitumumab; line of therapy)