Skip to main content

Table 1 Reported HR for PFS and OS and severe AEs rate of each eligible study

From: Comparative efficacy and safety of different combinations of three CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapies in HR+/HER-2 − metastatic or advanced breast cancer patients: a network meta-analysis

Study

Study

Control

HR for PFS

HR for OS

Severe AEs rate, %

PALOMA-1

P + AI

AI

0.488

(0.319, 0.748)

0.9897

(0.623, 1.294)

75.90 vs. 20.78

PALOMA-2

P + AI

AI

0.563

(0.461, 0.687)

n.r.

79.28 vs. 28.38

PALOMA-3

P + F

F

0.50

(0.40, 0.62)

0.81

(0.64, 1.03)

72.33 vs. 21.84

MONALEESA-2

R + AI

AI

0.568

(0.457, 0.704)

0.746

(0.517, 1.078)

82.04 vs. 32.73

MONALEESA-3

R + F

F

0.593

(0.480, 0.732)

0.73

(0.59, 0.90)

28.51 vs. 16.53

MONALEESA-7

R + AI

AI

0.55

(0.44, 0.69)

0.71

(0.54, 0.95)

82.09 vs. 29.67

MONARCH-2

 A + F

F

0.553

(0.449, 0.681)

0.757

(0.606, 0.945)

65.99 vs. 26.91

MONARCH-3

 A + AI

AI

0.540

(0.418, 0.698)

n.r.

58.41 vs. 24.84

MONARCH plus (cohort A)

A + AI

AI

0.499

(0.346, 0.719)

n.r.

59.02 vs. 23.23

MONARCH plus (cohort B)

A + F

F

0.376

(0.240, 0.588)

n.r.

51.92 vs. 15.09

  1. P, palbociclib; R, ribociclib; A, abemaciclib; AI, aromatase inhibitor; F, fulvestrant; AEs, adverse events; HR, hazard ratio; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; n.r., not reported