Table 2 Logistic regression models examining index measures at month-6 as mediators of intervention effect on alter cervical cancer (CC) screening
CC Knowledge | Sharing CC screening experience | CC prevention advocacy | Mean CC screening advocacy across all alters | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Without mediator | With mediator | Without mediator | With mediator | Without mediator | With mediator | Without mediator | With mediator | |
OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
Intervention | 1.75 (1.60, 1.91) | 3.49 (0.21, 57.29) | 1.15 (1.06, 1.24) | 3.72 (0.13, 109.20) | 1.47 (1.37, 1.59) | 7.78 (0.71, 85.32) | 1.10 (1.07, 1.12) | 3.58 (0.99, 12.90) |
Direct effect | 67.15 (0.21, 21868.35) | 7.50 (1.50, 37.42) | 70.89 (4.54, 1106.88) | 6.95 (1.72, 28.04) | ||||
CC knowledge (bsln) | 1.01 (1.00, 1.02) | 1.07 (0.96, 1.19) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CC knowledge (M6) | -- | 1.06 (0.63, 1.79) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Sharing CC screening experience (bsln) | -- | -- | 1.12 (1.01, 1.25) | 0.62 (0.30, 1.29) | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Sharing CC screening experience (M6) | -- | -- | -- | 1.84 (0.15, 23.06) | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CC prevention advocacy (bsln) | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1.07 (1.04, 1.10) | 1.09 (0.87, 1.37) | -- | -- |
CC prevention advocacy (M6) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0.70 (0.26, 1.84) | -- | -- |
Mean CC screening advocacy (bsln) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0.98 (0.92, 1.04) | 1.02 (0.47, 2.18) |
Mean CC screening advocacy (M6) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 4.19 (1.58, 11.15) |
Indirect effect | 0.14 (0.00, 41.10) | 1.48 (0.94, 2.33) | 0.13 (0.01, 1.84) | 1.53 (0.80, 2.92) | ||||