Table 4 Performance of standalone AI the historical first reader – by site and mammography equipment vendor
A) MK / IMS Giottoa | ||
Performance Metric | Historical first reader (%) | Standalone AI (%) |
On ten-year cohort | ||
Sensitivity | 79.4 (76.3, 82.2) | 85.7 (83.0, 88.1) |
Specificity | 95.4 (95.0, 95.7) | 96.1 (95.7, 96.4) |
On 2015-year cohort: with more complete IC data available | ||
Sensitivity | 82.0 (72.8, 88.6) | 85.4 (76.6, 91.3) |
Specificity | 96.5 (95.4, 97.3) | 96.2 (95.0, 97.0) |
B) NUH / GEb | ||
Performance Metric | Historical first reader (%) | Standalone AI (%) |
On ten-year cohort | ||
Sensitivity | 77.8 (74.6, 80.7) | 76.9 (73.7, 79.9) |
Specificity | 97.3 (97.0, 97.5) | 89.6 (89.2, 90.0) |
On 2015-year cohort: with more complete IC data available | ||
Sensitivity | 67.2 (58.4, 75.0) | 72.3 (63.6, 79.5) |
Specificity | 97.2 (96.8, 97.5) | 90.6 (89.9, 91.3) |
C) LTHT / Hologicb | ||
Performance Metric | Historical first reader (%) | Standalone AI (%) |
On ten-year cohort | ||
Sensitivity | 81.0 (77.8, 84.0) | 79.9 (76.5, 82.9) |
Specificity | 95.0 (94.7, 95.3) | 89.2 (88.8, 89.6) |
On 2015-year cohort: with more complete IC data available | ||
Sensitivity | 82.8 (73.9, 89.1) | 84.9 (76.3, 90.8) |
Specificity | 95.7 (95.1, 96.2) | 89.3 (88.5, 90.1) |
D) ULH / Siemensb | ||
Performance Metric | Historical first reader (%) | Standalone AI (%) |
On ten-year cohort | ||
Sensitivity | 76.7 (73.3, 79.8) | 77.3 (73.9, 80.4) |
Specificity | 96.4 (96.1, 96.8) | 89.9 (89.3, 90.5) |
On 2015-year cohort: with more complete IC data available | ||
Sensitivity | 70.5 (62.9, 77.1) | 73.1 (65.6, 79.4) |
Specificity | 97.1 (96.6, 97.6) | 89.7 (88.7, 90.6) |