Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of clinicopathological features between familial and sporadic patients groups

From: Increased prevalence of the founder BRCA1 c.5309G>T and recurrent BRCA2 c.1310_1313delAAGA mutations in breast cancer families from Northerstern region of Morocco: evidence of geographical specificity and high relevance for genetic counseling

Patients Groups

Familial

Sporadic

 

Clinical featuresb

N (%)

N (%)

Pa

Age at diagnosis

 Mean (years ± SD)

38,58 ± 0.95

45.62 ± 0.95

 < 10–6

 (Min–Max)

(25–71)

(30–72)

  ≤ 39

47 (55.3)

28 (28.9)

 

  > 39

38 (44.7)

69 (71.1)

0.0003

BRCA1 c.5309G>T

 Positive

9 (10.7)

1 (1.1)

0.007

 Negative

75 (89.3)

91 (98.9)

BRCA2 c.1310_1313 DelAAGA

 Positive (total: 12)***

7 (11.9)

3 (3.9)

0.1

 Negative

52 (88.1)

74 (96.1)

Both mutations

 Positive (total: 22)***

16 (19)

4 (4.2)

0.002

 Negative

68 (81)

91 (95.8)

Laterality

 Bilateral

8 (9.4)

0 (0)

 

 Unilateral

77 (90.6)

97 (100)

0.002

Histological type

 Ductal invasive

71 (83.5)

83 (85.6)

 

 Lobular invasive

8 (9.4)

9 (9.3)

0.86

 others

6 (7.1)

5 (5.2)

 

Histological grade

 I + II

59 (69.4)

79 (82.3)

 

 III

26 (30.6)

17 (17.7)

0.04

RE

 Positive

63 (75)

67 (69.8)

 

 Negative

21 (25)

29 (30.2)

0.44

RP

 Positive

59 (70.2)

59 (61.5)

 

 Negative

25 (29.8)

37 (38.5)

0.22

Her-2

 Positive

17 (21.5)

18 (18.8)

 

 Negative

62 (78.5)

78 (81.2)

0.65

Sub-Type

 Luminal

44 (55.7)

63 (65.6)

 

 Her-2 + 

16 (20.3)

18 (18.8)

0.31

 Triple Negative

19 (24.0)

15 (15.6)

 

Tumor size

 T1

20 (24.1)

17 (18.1)

 

 T2

53 (63.9)

51 (54.3)

0.03

 T3-T4

10 (12)

26 (27.7)

 

Node

 N + 

54 (64.3)

76 (79.2)

 

 N0

30 (35.7)

20 (20.8)

0.026

Metastase

 M0

80 (95.2)

74 (77.1)

 

 M + 

4 (4.8)

22 (22.9)

0.001

  1. N (%) number and percentage of individuals (except for mean ± SD age), SD Standard deviation, Her-2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, PR Progesterone receptor, ER estrogen receptor, TN Triple negative
  2. Unknown data were excluded from statistical analysis
  3. abold values are statistically significant (P < 0.05)
  4. b Clinicopathological data are missing for two patients; therefore, these are not included in the calculations
  5. The 4 males BC are not included in this analysis