Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of secondary endpoints among different regimens

From: Clinical efficacy and prognosis analysis of treatment regimens for EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastasis: a retrospective study

Therapeutic regimen

OS (m)

95% CI

P value

Intracranial ORR

P value

Extracranial ORR

P value

Group A

27.9

22.6–33.2

0.577

28.6% (21/75)

0.339

48.6% (35/74)

0.139

Group B

24.4

18.5–30.2

36.6% (15/41)

62.2% (23/37)

Group C

N/A

-

0.458

66.7% (6/9)

1.000

71.4% (5/7)

1.000

Group D

N/A

-

64.3% (9/14)

80.0% (8/10)

Group A + B

25.9

22.0-29.9

0.043

31.0% (36/116)

0.002

52.3% (58/111)

0.108

Group C + D

N/A

-

65.2% (15/23)

76.5% (13/17)

  1. Note: Group A: 1st generation EGFR-TKIs monotherapy; Group B: 1st generation EGFR-TKIs + pemetrexed plus cisplatin/carboplatin chemotherapy; Group C: 1st generation EGFR-TKIs + bevacizumab; Group D: 1st generation EGFR-TKIs + pemetrexed plus cisplatin/carboplatin chemotherapy + bevacizumab
  2. Abbreviations: m, month; N/A, not reached; ORR, overall remission rate; OS, overall survival; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor