Table 3 Results of the quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool
Study,year | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient selection | Index test | Reference standard | Flow and timing | Patient selection | Index test | Reference standard | |
Ohno Y [2], 2015 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Heusch P [3], 2015 | Unclear | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Unclear | Low risk | Low risk |
Lee SM [4], 2016 | Unclear | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Unclear | Low risk | Low risk |
Melsaether AN [5], 2016 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Huellner MW [6], 2016 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Sekine T [7], 2017 | Unclear | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Unclear | Low risk | Low risk |
Catalano OA [8] 2017 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Ohno Y [9] 2017 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Botsikas D [10] 2019 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Ohno Y [11] 2019 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Liu Y [12] 2019 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk |
Yeh CH [13] 2020 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk |
Ohno Y [14] 2020 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Ohno Y [15] 2021 | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |