Skip to main content

Table 2 Pathologic characteristics of the rectal cancer patients

From: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and triweekly oxaliplatin versus capecitabine monotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a propensity-score matched study

 

Baseline

After propensity score matching

Triweekly

XELOX n = 277

Capecitabine n = 533

SMD

Triweekly

XELOX n = 191

Capecitabine n = 319

SMD

ypT stage

 ypT0

60 (21.7%)

111 (20.8%)

 

43 (22.5%)

66 (20.7%)

 

 ypT1–2

73 (26.4%)

179 (33.6%)

 

50 (26.2%)

113 (35.4%)

 

 ypT3–4

144 (52.0%)

243 (45.6%)

0.069

98 (51.3%)

140 (43.9%)

0.069

ypN stage

 ypN0

186 (67.1%)

395 (74.1%)

 

133 (69.6%)

231 (72.4%)

 

 ypN1

70 (25.3%)

113 (21.2%)

 

46 (24.1%)

73 (22.9%)

 

 ypN2

21 (7.6%)

25 (4.7%)

0.157

12 (6.3%)

15 (4.7%)

0.073

No. of sampled lymph nodes

 Median (range)

11 (1–88)

13 (0–73)

−0.094

11 (1–34)

13 (0–73)

− 0.291

ypStage

 0

57 (20.6%)

106 (19.9%)

 

41 (21.5%)

62 (19.4%)

 

 I

57 (20.6%)

145 (27.2%)

 

41 (21.5%)

91 (28.5%)

 

 II

70 (25.3%)

142 (26.6%)

 

49 (25.7%)

78 (24.5%)

 

 III

89 (32.1%)

131 (24.6%)

 

57 (29.8%)

83 (26.0%)

 

 IV

4 (1.4%)

9 (1.7%)

0.106

3 (1.6%)

5 (1.6%)

0.059

Primary tumor downstaging

 Yes

193 (69.7%)

414 (77.7%)

 

137 (71.7%)

249 (78.1%)

 

 No

84 (30.3%)

119 (22.3%)

0.174

54 (28.3%)

70 (21.9%)

−0.101

pCR

 Yes

56 (20.2%)

106 (19.9%)

 

40 (20.9%)

62 (19.4%)

 

 No

221 (79.8%)

427 (80.1%)

0.008

151 (79.1%)

257 (80.6%)

0.037

RCRG

 1

139 (50.2%)

283 (53.1%)

 

95 (49.7%)

167 (52.4%)

 

 2

82 (29.6%)

210 (39.4%)

 

68 (35.6%)

128 (40.1%)

 

 3

11 (4.0%)

35 (6.6%)

0.140

7 (3.7%)

21 (6.6%)

−0.096

 Undermined

45 (16.2%)

5 (0.9%)

 

21 (11.0%)

3 (0.9%)

 
  1. SMD Standardized mean difference, No. Number, pCR Pathological complete response, RCRG Rectal cancer regression grade