Peer Review reports
From: Reflecting on the utility of standardized uptake values on 18F-FDG PET in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Jan 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 6 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 11 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 18 Mar 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Chuanben Chen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 18 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 19 Mar 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Chuanben Chen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 19 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 27 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 10 Apr 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 12 Apr 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Chuanben Chen |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 12 Apr 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 13 Apr 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Chuanben Chen |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 13 Apr 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 22 Apr 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 29 Apr 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 5 May 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12885-022-09626-w |
You can find further information about peer review here.