Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics and outcome of included studies

From: Oral cryotherapy for management of chemotherapy‐induced oral mucositis in haematopoietic cell transplantation: a systematic review

Author

Pain and Mucositis

Assessment Tool

Mucositis Status (Grade 3–4)

Study Outcome

Lilleby et al. 2006 [25]

NRS

NCI-CTC

 

Treatment

Control

P value

OC was significantly more effective than normal saline mouthwash in reducing the incidence of developing grade 3–4 OM. It also reduces the use of narcotics (P = 0.0003) and TPN (P = 0.04). The intervention did not reduce length of hospitalization; however, it improves patient's wellbeing

14%

74%

0.0005

Gori et al. 2007 [33]

NA

WHO-OTS

 

47%

53%

0.46

In patients receiving low dose Methotrexate chemotherapy, OC did not reduce the incidence of developing sever OM grade3-4

Svanberg et al. 2007 [26], Svanberg et al. 2010 [27]

VAS

Modified version of (OMAS)

Day 10a

1.60 ± 1.9

4.30 ± 5.7

0.042

OC was significantly more effective than the basic oral care in reducing the incidence of OM grade 3–4. The Use of pain killers, TPN, and duration of hospital stay was also reduced

Day 16b

3.70 ± 1.8

11.6 ± 6.8

0.021

2010c

23%

52%

 < 0.05

Salvador et al. 2012 [28]

VAS

WHO-OTS

Day 6

0.09 ± 0.12

0.05 ± 0.12

0.02

OC was significantly more effective than the usual oral care. However, it did not reduce the duration of hospital stay (P = 0.17) or improves nutritional status

Day 9

0.43 ± 0.12

1.14 ± 0.12

 < 0.001

Day 12

0.04 ± 0.12

0.41 ± 0.12

0.03

Askarifar et al. 2016 [29]

NA

WHO-OTS

Day 3

0.31 ± 0.17

0.77 ± 0.43

0.112

OC was significantly more effective than normal saline mouthwash in reducing the severity of OC in day 7th and 14th

Day 7

1.81 ± 0.83

2.54 ± 0.87

0.031

Day 14

0.13 ± 0.08

0.92 ± 0.08

0.004

Marchesi et al. 2016 [30]

NRS

NCI-CTC

 

5.6%

44.4%

0.0002

OC group presented a significant lower occurrence of both grade 3–4 OM but also reduce the need for opioids IV therapy (p = 0.001) and TPN use (P = 0.005)

Kamsvag et al. 2020 [32]

Children Institutional Oral Mucositis Evaluation Scale FPS (4–6 years old) NRS (≥ 7 years old)

WHO-OTS

 

58%

48%

0.43

OC did not reduce the incidence of sever OM and use of pain killers (P = 0.34) and TPN (P = 0.35)

Lu et al. 2020 [31]

NA

NCI-CTC

 

24%

39%

0.012

Both arm A and B were associated with a reduction on the incidence and duration of OM compared to arm D

  1. a Autologous, Svanberg et al. 2007 [26], b Allogeneic/URD, Svanberg et al. 2007 [26], c Svanberg et al. 2010[27]
  2. The OC incidence rate was reported as percentage (%) in Lilleby et al. 2006 [25], Gori et al. 2007 [33], Svanberg et al. 2010 [27], Marchesi et al. 2016 [30], Kamsvag et al. 2020 [32], and Lu et al. 2020 [31] while in Svanberg et al. 2010 [27], Salvador et al. 2012 [28], Askarifar et al. 2016 [29], as mean ± SD
  3. WHO-OTS world health organization-oral toxicity scale, NCI-CTC national cancer institute-common toxicity criteria, OMAS oral mucositis assessment score, VAS Visual Analogue Scale, NRS Numerical Rating Scale, FPS Face Pain Scale, OC oral cryotherapy, OM oral mucositis, TPN total parenteral nutrition, NA not applicable