Skip to main content

Table 1 Differences in clinicopathological features due to treatments for dyslipidemia

From: Relationship between serum lipid levels and the immune microenvironment in breast cancer patients: a retrospective study

 

Treatment for dyslipidemia (n = 938)

 
 

No (n = 744)

Yes (n = 194)

p value

Age at diagnosis (year)

 ≤61 / >61

438 (58.9%) / 306(41.1%)

47 (24.2%) / 147(75.8%)

p<0.001

Menopause

 Pre / Post

267 (35.9%) / 477(64.1%)

14 (7.2%) / 180(92.8%)

p<0.001

Diabetes

 Negative / Positive

693 (93.2%) / 51(6.8%)

142 (73.2%) / 52(26.8%)

p<0.001

Tumor size (cm)

 ≤2 / >2

422 (56.7%) / 322(43.3%)

108 (55.7%) / 86(44.3%)

p = 0.808

Lymph node status

 Negative / Positive

492 (66.1%) / 252(33.9%)

138 (71.1%) / 56(28.9%)

p = 0.199

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

 No / Yes

663 (89.1%) / 81(10.9%)

186 (95.9%) / 8(4.1%)

p = 0.004

Intrinsic subtype

 Luminal / Luminal-HER /

513 (68.9%) / 96(12.9%) /

131 (67.5%) / 23(11.9%) /

p = 0.861

 HER2-enruch / TNBC

51 (6.9) / 84(11.3%)

16 (8.2) / 24(12.4%)

  1. HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer