Comparative analysis of the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in evaluating the histological grade of cervical squamous carcinoma

Table 3 Comparison of ROC curve between Grade 1 and Grade 2 CSC

Parameters	AUC	Threshold	P-value	Sensitivity(%)	Specificity (%)	95% CI
MTRasym (%)	0.883	3.000	< 0.001	76.9%	90.5%	0.726–0.967
MK	0.852	0.875	0.001	84.6%	66.7%	0.688–0.950
MD (×10⁻³ mm²/s)	0.828	1.065	0.002	76.9%	81.0%	0.660–0.935
ADC (×10⁻³ mm²/s)	0.799	0.955	0.004	53.8%	100%	0.626–0.916
APTWI+DWI	0.949	/	< 0.001	90.5%	92.3%	0.814–0.995
DKI + DWI	0.982	/	< 0.001	100.0%	95.2%	0.865–1.000
DKI + APTW	0.967	/	< 0.001	100.0%	80.95%	0.841–0.999
APTWI+DKI + DWI	0.993	/	< 0.001	100.0%	95.2%	0.884–1.000

APTWI + DWI = MTRasym +ADC; DKI + APTW = MD + MK + MTRasym; DKI + DWI = MD + MK + ADC; APTWI + DKI + DWI = MTRasym + MD + MK + ADC

ISSN: 1471-2407