Skip to main content

Table 2 Studies characteristics

From: Mapping psychosocial interventions in familial colorectal cancer: a rapid systematic review

No.

Authors, Publication Year

Intervention Type

Study Design

Diagnosis

Cancer History

Outcome type

Provider’s Background

Intervention Format

Mean Age

N

1

[11] Aktan-Collan et al., 2007

GC

Prospective

LS

Familial

A, C, QOL

GB

FTF

51,6

72

2

[12] Aktan-Collan et al., 2013

GC

Prospective

LS

Familial

A, C, QOL

GB

FTF

44,3

208

3

[13] Anderson et al., 2014

EDU

Experimental

fCRC

Familial

A, C

CG

TEL

51,2

272

4

[14] Armelao et al., 2010

EDU

Experimental

fCRC

Familial

B

NGB

FTF

57,57

796

5

[15] Arver et al., 2004

GC

Prospective

LS

Familial

A, QOL

GB

FTF

42,7

20

6

[16] Baghianimoghadam et al., 2012

EDU

Prospective

fCRC

Familial

C

NGB

FTF

39,05

99

7

[17] Bastani et al., 2015

EDU

Experimental

fCRC

Familial

A, B

Print/NGB

WRT, TEL

51

1030

8

[18] Bauer et al., 2018

EDU/EDU, PSI

Experimental

fCRC

Familial

B

Print/NGB

WRT, TEL

50.8

261

9

[19] Brain et al., 2005

GC

Experimental

LS

Familial

A, C, QOL

GB

FTF

41

26

10

[20] Burton-Chase et al., 2013

GC

Prospective

LS

Familial

B, C

GC, NBG

FTF

42

78

11

[21] Claes et al., 2005

GC, PSI

Prospective

LS

Familial

A

GB, NGB

FTF

39,25

36

12

[22] Codori et al., 2003

EDU

Prospective

FAP

Familial

A, B

GB

FTF

11,8

35

13

[23] Codori et al., 2005

GC

Prospective

LS

Familial

A, C

GC, NGB

FTF

43,8

101

14

[24] Collins et al., 2000 (a)

GC, EDU

Prospective

LS, fCRC

Mixt

C

GC, GB, NGB

FTF

46,7

126

15

[25] Collins et al., 2000 (b)

GC, EDU

Prospective

LS, fCRC

Mixt

A

GC, GB, NGB

FTF

47

127

16

[26] Collins et al., 2005

GC, EDU

Prospective

LS

Familial

B

NS

FTF

41,33

114

17

[27] Collins et al., 2007

GC, EDU

Prospective

LS

Familial

A

NS

FTF

41

73

18

[28] Dudok deWit et al., 1998

GC

Prospective

FAP

Familial

A

NGB

FTF

28,6

23

19

[29] Esplen et al., 2019

EDU, PSI

Experimental

fCRC

Familial

B, C

GC/NBG

FTF/TEL

47.4

278

20

[30] Glanz et al., 2007

EDU

Experimental

fCRC

Familial

A, B, C, QOL

NGB

FTF, TEL

54,4

176

21

[31] Gritz et al., 1999

GC

Prospective

LS

Familial

A

GC, NGB

FTF

ns

11

22

[32] Gritz et al., 2005

GC

Prospective

LS

Mixt

A, C, QOL

GC, NGB

FTF

ns

155

23

[33] Hadley et al., 2004

GC

Prospective

LS

Familial

B

GC

FTF

38,1

56

24

[34] Hadley et al., 2008

GC

Prospective

LS

Mixt

C, B

GC

FTF

37

65

25

[35] Hadley et al., 2011

GC

Prospective

LS

Mixt

A, B

GC

FTF

41

129

26

[36] Halbert et al., 2004

GC

Prospective

LS

Familial

B

NGB

FTF

49,3

71

27

[37] Hasenbring et al., 2011

GC

Prospective

LS

Mixt

A

GB, NGB

FTF

40,86

122

28

[38] Hawkes et al., 2012

PSI

Prospective

fCRC

Familial

A, B, QOL

NGB

TEL

47,3

22

29

[39] Ho et al., 2012

PSI

Prospective

LS, FAP

Mixt

A, C

NGB

FTF

49,4

22

30

[40] Ingrand et al., 2016

EDU

Experimental

fCRC

Mixt

B

Print/NGB

WRT, TEL

53,1

429

31

[41] Johnson et al., 2002

GC

Prospective

LS, FAP

Familial

B

NS

FTF

55

65

32

[42] Keller et al., 2002

GC, PSI, EDU

Prospective

LS

Mixt

A, C, QOL

GB, NGB

FTF

43,29

65

33

[43] Keller et al., 2008

GC, PSI, EDU

Prospective

LS

Mixt

A, C

GB, NGB

FTF

44

372

34

[44] Kinney et al., 2014

PSI

Experimental

fCRC

Familial

B

Print/GC

WRT, TEL

50,3

378

35

[45] Loader et al., 2005

GC

Prospective

LS

Mixt

A, C, B

GC

FTF

59,9

38

36

[46] Lowery et al., 2014

EDU/EDU, PSI

Experimental

LS, fCRC

Familial

B, C

Print/NGB

WRT, TEL

ns

632

37

[47] Lynch et al., 1997

GC

Prospective

LS

Familial

C

GC

FTF

ns

20

38

[48] Manne et al., 2009

EDU/EDU, PSI

Experimental

fCRC

Familial

B, C

Print/NGB

WRT, TEL

47,9

366

39

[49] Manne et al., 2010

EDU

Experimental

fCRC

Mixt

A, C, B, QOL

NGB

FTF, WRT

46,3

213

40

[50] McClish et al., 2014

EDU

Prospective

fCRC

Familial

B

Print, NS

WRT, TEL

46,8

70

41

[51] McGowan et al., 2012

EDU

Experimental

fCRC

Familial

B, C

NGB

FTF

45,5

140

42

[52] Meiser et al., 2004

GC

Prospective

LS

Familial

A

NS

FTF

41,3

114

43

[53] Murakami et al., 2004

GC

Prospective

LS

Mixt

A

GB

FTF

47

42

44

[54] Pieterse et al., 2005

GC

Prospective

fCRC

Mixt

A, C

GB

FTF

48,61

52

45

[55] Rawl et al., 2008

EDU

Experimental

fCRC

Familial

B, C

Print

WRT

53

140

46

[56] Rawl et al., 2015

EDU

Experimental

fCRC

Familial

B, C

Print/NGB

WRT, TEL

60

145

47

[57] Rimes et al., 2006

GC

Prospective

fCRC

Familial

A, C

GB

FTF

44,2

37

48

[58] Salimzadeh et al., 2018

PSI

Experimental

fCRC

Familial

B, C

NGB

TEL

47.2

240

49

[59] Shiloh et al., 2008

GC

Prospective

LS

Mixt

A

GC

FTF

42,45

253

50

[60] Stehpens & Moore, 2007

EDU

Experimental

fCRC

Mixt

B, C

Print

WRT

50,76

91

51

[61] Voorwinden & Jaspers, 2015

GC

Prospective

LS

Familial

A, C

GC

FTF

41,87

28

52

[62] Wakefield et al., 2008

GC, EDU

Experimental

LS

Mixt

B, C, QOL

Print/NS

FTF, WRT

50,5

109

  1. Intervention: GC Genetic counselling; EDU Educational interventions; PSI psychological interventions; Diagnosis: LS Lynch Syndrome, FAP Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, fCRC familial Colorectal Cancer; Cancer History: Familial, Mixt Personal + Familial; Outcome type: E emotional; C cognitive; B behavioural, QOL quality of life; Provider’s Background: GC genetic counsellor, GB medical genetics background, NGB non-genetics medical background; Intervention format: FTF face to face, TEL telephone, WRT written, NS not specified