Skip to main content

Table 6 Multivariable analysis using logistic regressions

From: Fatigue in breast cancer patients on chemotherapy: a cross-sectional study exploring clinical, biological, and genetic factors

Factor

ORa

95% CI

p-value

Model 1: Cycle number

 Cycle number

1.44

1.12–1.85

0.004

Model 2: Cycle number plus chemotherapy type and factors

 Cycle number

1.51

1.07–2.12

0.018

 Chemotherapy type

  

0.254

 Adjuvant vs Neoadjuvant

0.29

0.02–3.55

0.333

 Palliative vs Neoadjuvant

0.77

0.05–10.95

0.844

 Capecitabine

767 × 106

0 - Indefinite

1.000

 Cyclophosphamide

1.80

0.46–7.01

0.400

 Neuropathic pain treatment

1.18

0.08–18.03

0.904

Model 3: Biological measures

 Hemoglobin

0.67

0.45–0.99

0.046

 Leucocytes

1.00

1.00–1.00

0.189

 Platelets

1.00

1.00–1.00

0.733

Model 4: Genes

 ABCB1 rs1045642

0.92

0.40–2.12

0.848

 CLOCK rs1801260 TT vs TC

0.29

0.07–1.15

0.077

 COMT rs4680 (V/V & V/M vs M/M)

1.37

0.29–6.38

0.693

 PER2 rs934945 (GG & GA) vs AA

0.56

0.02–13.02

0.716

 CRY2 rs10838524 (GG & GA) vs AA

3.12

0.44–21.89

0.253

 DRD2 rs6277 (CC & CT vs TT)

4.09

1.02–16.48

0.047

Model 5: Full factor modela

 Cycle number

1.36

0.98–1.89

0.066

 CLOCK rs1801260 TT vs TC

0.29

0.07–1.29

0.104

 DRD2 rs6277 (CC & CT vs TT)

3.79

0.84–17.20

0.084

 Hemoglobin

0.38

0.50–1.30

0.376

  1. aFactors with p-value < 0.10 from other models were introduced