Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The importance of choosing the right strategy to treat small cell carcinoma of the cervix: a comparative analysis of treatments

Original Submission
30 Oct 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Dec 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
29 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Abi Jaoude
22 Apr 2021 Author responded Author comments - Mariko Kawamura
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Apr 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 May 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Abi Jaoude
3 Jun 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Jun 2021 Author responded Author comments - Mariko Kawamura
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jun 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jul 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Aug 2021 Author responded Author comments - Mariko Kawamura
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Aug 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Aug 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Sep 2021 Author responded Author comments - Mariko Kawamura
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Sep 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
6 Sep 2021 Author responded Author comments - Mariko Kawamura
Resubmission - Version 6
6 Sep 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
8 Sep 2021 Editorially accepted
23 Sep 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12885-021-08772-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page