Skip to main content

Table 3 Gene set enrichment analysis for gene body DNA methylation in relation to four clinical endpoints of GC patients in TCGA

From: DNA methylation signatures associated with prognosis of gastric cancer

ID

Description

Number of genes

Number of unique genes

OS

DSS

PFI

DFI

P-value

FDR

P-value

FDR

P-value

FDR

P-value

FDR

GOa

 35267

NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex

31

20

0.002

0.066

0.007

0.197

0.047

0.477

0.002

0.042

 36019

Endolysosome

21

20

0.012

0.219

0.002

0.078

0.006

0.152

0.017

0.220

 36020

Endolysosome membrane

14

14

0.007

0.154

0.001

0.036

0.003

0.106

0.036

0.364

 43189

H4/H2A histone acetyltransferase complex

31

20

0.002

0.066

0.007

0.197

0.047

0.477

0.002

0.042

 44346

Fibroblast apoptotic process

24

24

0.036

0.409

0.024

0.409

0.029

0.370

1.51 × 10−4

0.008

KEGG

 04080

Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction

272

272

1.24 × 10−16

2.64 × 10−14

2.32 × 10−16

4.95 × 10−14

3.44 × 10−10

7.34 × 10−8

1.000

1.000

 04144

Endocytosis

201

201

0.005

0.324

0.026

0.923

0.027

0.645

0.194

0.858

 04950

Maturity onset diabetes of the young

25

25

0.037

0.901

0.010

0.634

0.008

0.329

1.000

1.000

 05217

Basal cell carcinoma

55

55

0.017

0.712

0.011

0.634

0.035

0.749

1.000

1.000

  1. Abbreviations: GC gastric cancer, OS overall survival, DSS disease-specific survival, DFI disease-free interval, PFI progression-free interval, HRs hazard ratios, CI confidence interval, FDR false discovery rate
  2. aEach GO annotation includes an evidence code to indicate how the annotation to a particular term is supported. If a gene is linked to a GO annotation by two distinct evidence codes (e.g., Inferred from Direct Assay (IDA) and Inferred from Biological aspect of Ancestor (IBA)), it would be counted twice to the number of genes enriched in that gene set