Table 7 Comparison of cutoff value, sensitivity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy across previous studies and present study
Author | Year | Number | Modality | Cutoff value | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arii et al. [18] | 2006 | 53 | CT | 7 mm | 22% | 78% | 8% | 95% | 75% |
Arii et al. [18] | 2006 | 53 | MRI | 7 mm | 56% | 97% | 91% | 81% | 83% |
Fujita et al. [8] | 2009 | 210 | CT | 5 mm | 62% | 90% | 64% | 89% | 84% |
Akasu et al. [10]. | 2009 | 104 | MRI | 4 mm (short axis) | 87% | 87% | 52% | 97% | 87% |
Akasu et al. [10] | 2009 | 104 | MRI | 3 mm (short axis) | 93% | 81% | 45% | 99% | 83% |
Matsuoka et al. [11] | 2007 | 51 | MRI | 5 mm (short axis) | 67% | 83% | – | – | 78% |
Ishibe et al. [19] | 2016 | 84 | MRI | 10 mm (short axis) | 43.8% | 98.5% | 87.5% | 88.2% | 88.1% |
Amano et al. [20]. | 2019 | 46 | MRI | 6 mm (short axis) | 35.3% | 97% | 54.6% | 94% | 91.3% |
Amano et al. [20] | 2019 | 46 | CT | 6 mm (short axis) | 35.3% | 100% | 100% | 96.7% | 94% |
This study | 2020 | 84 | PET | SUVmax 1.5 | 82.4% | 93.4% | 58.3% | 97.9% | 92.3% |
This study | 2020 | 84 | MDCT | 10 mm (short axis) | 64.7% | 95.4% | 61.1% | 96.0% | 92.3% |
This study | 2020 | 84 | MDCT | 7 mm (short axis) | 70.6% | 82.1% | 30.8% | 96.1% | 81.0% |