Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics

From: Comparison of short-term outcomes between transthoracic and robot-assisted transmediastinal radical surgery for esophageal cancer: a prospective study

 

TME (n = 25)

TTE (n = 35)

p value*

Median age (range)

66 (43–78)

66 (51–82)

0.96

Sex (M/F)

23/2

28/7

0.28

Median BMI (range)

22.4 (17.9–28.6)

22.2 (17.5–29.7)

0.55

ECOG-PS (0/1)

9/16

10/25

0.58

Brinkman Index (0/ 1–600/ 601–1200/ 1201-)

7/10/5/3

7/12/13/3

0.55

Location (Proximal/Middle/Distal/EGJ)

2/18/4/1

2/19/8/6

0.35

Anastomosis site (Cervical/Intrathoracic)

25/0

7/28

<.0001*

Number of three-field lymphadenectomies (%)

22 (88.0%)

23 (65.7%)

0.07

Clinical classification

 cT Status (0/1/2/3)

0/17/8/0

2/13/10/10

0.0043*

 cN Status (0/1/2)

20/5/0

28/6/1

1.00

Pathological classification

 pT Status (0/1/2/3)

0/19/3/3

1/16/2/16

0.01*

 pN Status (0/1/2/3)

13/6/5/1

16/12/5/2

0.16

 pStage (0/IA/IB/IIA/IIB/IIIA/IIIB/IIIC)

0/10/2/1/5/6/0/1

1/11/1/3/5/8/5/1

0.52

 Resection status (R0/R1/R2)

25/0/0

34/1/0

1.00

 Histological type (SCC/AC/Other)

24/0/1

31/3/1

0.38

 

Number of cases (%)

p value

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: n (%)

2 (8.0%)

11 (31.4%)

0.054

Adjuvant chemotherapy: n (%)

9 (36.0%)

11 (31.4%)

0.78

  1. *Fisher’s exact test. AC, adenocarcinoma; BMI, body mass index; EGJ, esophagogastric junction; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; TME, transmediastinal esophagectomy; TTE, transthoracic esophagectomy