Skip to main content

Table 3 GRADE evaluation of the studies

From: Comparison between nab-paclitaxel and solvent-based taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Certainty assessment

№ of patients

Effect

Certainty

Importance

№ of studies

Study design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

nab-paclitaxel

sb-taxanes

Relative(95% CI)

Absolute(95% CI)

pCR (assessed with: ypT0 ypN0)

5

observational studies

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

429/1069 (40.1%)

333/1065 (31.3%)

OR 1.52(1.27 to 1.83)

96 more per 1000(from 54 more to 142 more)

LOW

CRITICAL

pCR (assessed with: ypT0/is ypN0)

5

observational studies

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

379/1140 (33.2%)

315/1195 (26.4%)

OR 1.40(1.17 to 1.68)

70 more per 1000(from 32 more to 112 more)

LOW

CRITICAL

ORR

4

observational studies

not serious

not serious

not serious

serious a

none

832/1057 (78.7%)

848/1116 (76.0%)

OR 1.19(0.97 to 1.46)

30 more per 1000(from 6 fewer to 62 more)

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

OS

2

randomised trials

not serious

not serious

not serious

serious a

none

106/846 (12.5%)

130/819 (15.9%)

OR 0.79(0.60 to 1.04)

29 fewer per 1000(from 57 fewer to 5 more)

MODERATE

IMPORTANT

EFS

2

randomised trials

not serious

not serious

not serious

not serious

none

952 participants

949 participants

HR 0.69(0.57 to 0.85)[EFS]

-- per 1000(from -- to --)

HIGH

IMPORTANT

0.0%

-- per 1000(from -- to --)

  1. CI Confidence interval; OR Odds ratio; HR Hazard Ratio
  2. Explanations
  3. aThe CI includes the possibility of both harms or benefits