Skip to main content

Table 3 Details of Results of Experiments 1 and 2

From: A convolutional neural network-based system to classify patients using FDG PET/CT examinations

Experiment 1

(a) Image-based

Correct Label

Benign

Malignant

Equivocal

Prediction

Benign

96.6%

2.4%

10.1%

Malignant

0.3%

97.3%

12.1%

Equivocal

3.2%

0.2%

77.8%

(b) Image-based Evaluation Measures

 

Recall score

Precision score

F measure

Prediction

Benign

0.966

0.917

0.941

Malignant

0.973

0.936

0.954

Equivocal

0.778

0.986

0.87

(c) Patient-based Algorithm A

Correct Label

Benign

Malignant

Equivocal

Prediction

Benign

91.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Malignant

9.0%

100.0%

42.5%

Equivocal

0.0%

0.0%

57.5%

(d) Patient -based Algorithm A Evaluation Measures

 

Recall score

Precision score

F measure

Prediction

Benign

0.910

1.000

0.953

Malignant

1.000

0.764

0.866

Equivocal

0.575

1.000

0.730

(e) Patient-based Algorithm B

Correct Label

Benign

Malignant

Equivocal

Prediction

Benign

99.4%

0.6%

3.8%

Malignant

0.6%

99.4%

8.8%

Equivocal

0.0%

0.0%

87.5%

(f) Patient -based Algorithm B Evaluation Measures

 

Recall score

Precision score

F measure

Prediction

Benign

0.994

0.975

0.984

Malignant

0.994

0.951

0.972

Equivocal

0.875

1.000

0.933

Experiment 2

(g) Head and Neck

Correct Label

Benign

Malignant

Equivocal

Prediction

Benign

97.8%

1.7%

3.0%

Malignant

1.5%

97.3%

0.8%

Equivocal

0.7%

1.1%

96.2%

(hd) Chest

Correct Label

Benign

Malignant

Equivocal

Prediction

Benign

98.4%

1.8%

5.9%

Malignant

0.6%

96.6%

1.6%

Equivocal

1.0%

1.6%

92.5%

(i) Abdomen

Correct Label

Benign

Malignant

Equivocal

Prediction

Benign

94.9%

5.7%

7.0%

Malignant

1.1%

92.8%

2.0%

Equivocal

4.1%

1.5%

91.0%

(j) Pelvic region

Correct Label

Benign

Malignant

Equivocal

Prediction

Benign

99.7%

0.4%

2.8%

Malignant

0.1%

99.6%

1.9%

Equivocal

0.3%

0.0%

95.3%