Skip to main content

Table 3 Factors that contributed to non-e-curative outcome in patients with early gastric cancers after ESD

From: Clinico-pathologic determinants of non-e-curative outcome following en-bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasia

Clinico-pathologic parameters

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

OR (95% CI)

p-value

OR (95% CI)

p-value

Age (in years)

1.05 (1.00–1.09)

0.049

1.08 (1.01–1.17)

0.029

Tumor location

 Lower one third

1 (Reference)

 

1 (Reference)

 

 Middle or Upper third

4.55 (2.04–10.12)

<  0.001

5.46 (1.65–18.12)

0.006

Gross tumor type

  Group 1

1 (Reference)

 

1 (Reference)

 

  Group 2

5.70 (1.65–19.65)

0.006

9.77 (1.23–77.65)

0.031

Ulceration status

  Absent

1 (Reference)

 

 1 (Reference)

 

  Present

3.03 (1.25–7.31)

0.014

2.39 (0.59–9.65)

0.223

Size of tumor

 ≤ 2 cm

1 (Reference)

 

 1 (Reference)

 

 >  2 cm

6.19 (2.79–13.77)

<  0.001

7.63 (2.29–25.42)

0.001

Differentiation

 Differentiated

1 (Reference)

 

1 (Reference)

 

 Undifferentiated

16.43 (6.60–40.89)

<  0.001

15.54 (1.65–146.22)

0.016

Lauren’s category

 Intestinal

1 (Reference)

 

1 (Reference)

 

 Non-intestinal

16.43 (6.60–40.89)

<  0.001

3.29 (0.36–31.40)

0.300

  1. ESD Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection, OR Odds Ratio, CI Confidence Interval, Group 1 = lesions with Protruding (0-I), Purely superficial flat (0-IIb) and Mixed variants with 0-IIb predominant, Group2 = Purely superficial elevated (0-IIa) or depressed (0-IIc) or mixed variants with either 0-IIa or 0-IIc predominant