Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of all studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Prognostic role of vitamin D receptor in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Country

Case number

High expression (%)

Pathological type

Molecular type

Staining location

Tumor stage

Follow-up (months)

Cut-off value

Multivariate analysis

HRs provided from

Outcome

NOS score

Heublein 2017 [16]

Germany

117

57 (48.7)

NR

Multiple

Nucleus

Multiple

Mean 81.8

IRS > 4.14

No

SC

OS

6

Huss 2019 [17]

Sweden

678

553 (81.6)

Multiple

Multiple

Nucleus

Multiple

NR

Positive cells > 10%

No

Report

CSS

8

Al-Azhri 2017 [18]

America

1114

283 (25.5)

NR

Multiple

Nucleus

Multiple

Median 72 (3–201)

IRS > 5

Yes

Report

OS/PFS/CSS

8

Ditsch 2012 [19]

Germany

82

75 (91.5)

Invasive ductal

Multiple

Nucleus and cytoplasm

NR

NR

IRS > 5

Yes

Report

OS/DFS

7

Soljic 2017 [20]

Yugoslavia

96

26 (27)

Multiple

Triple negative

Nucleus and cytoplasm

I-IIIa

Mean 69 (3–143)

NR

No

Report

OS/DFS

7

Ishida 2018 [21]

Japan

144

NR

NR

NR

Nucleus

I-III

Mean 7.7 (6–129)

NR

No

Report

DFS

8

Zehni (unifocal) 2019 [22]

Germany

155

66 (42.6)

Multiple

Multiple

Nucleus

NR

NR

IRS > 25

Yes

Report

OS/DFS

7

Zehni (multifocal) 2019 [22]

Germany

117

60 (51.3)

Multiple

Multiple

Nucleus

NR

NR

IRS > 25

Yes

Report

OS/DFS

7

  1. NR Not report, IRS Immunoreactive score, HR Hazard ratio, SC Survival curve, OS Overall survival, CSS Cancer-specific survival, PFS Progression-free survival, DFS Disease-free survival, NOS Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale