Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between clinicopathologic characteristics and HCC patient OS through univariate and multivariate analysis with Cox regression survival model

From: Increased E2F2 predicts poor prognosis in patients with HCC based on TCGA data

Characteristics

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

HR

95%CI

P-value

HR

95%CI

P-value

CDK6 (high vs. low)

0.8

0.4–1.4

0.400

1.0

0.5–2.0

0.973

RB1 expression (high vs. low)

0.7

0.4–1.3

0.230

0.7

0.3–1.4

0.298

Age (>40 vs. ≤ 40)

2.1

0.6–6.8

0.224

2.7

0.7–9.4

0.131

Gender (male vs. female)

0.6

0.3–1.1

0.082

1.0

0.5–2.0

0.951

Alcohol consumption (yes vs. no)

0.7

0.3–1.6

0.381

0.6

0.2–1.4

0.245

Histologic grade (G3–4 vs. G1–2)

1.3

0.8–1.9

0.293

1.3

0.8–1.9

0.312

M (M1 vs. M0)

4.8

0.7–35.5

0.122

2.4

0.4–13.9

0.323

N (N1 vs. N0)

3.8

0.5–28.0

0.188

0.1

0.0–17.4

0.352

T (T3–4 vs. T1–2)

1.4

1.0–2.0

0.033

0.2

0.0–1.9

0.160

Clinical stage (III-IV vs. I-II)

1.5

1.1–2.1

0.012

6.8

0.6–74.5

0.115

Postoperative ablation embolization (yes vs. no)

1.1

0.4–2.9

0.800

   

Radiation therapy (yes vs. no)

1.2

0.2–9.0

0.997

   

Family history of cancer (yes vs. no)

1.5

0.8–2.8

0.197

1.7

0.9–3.1

0.111

Vascular invasion (yes vs. no)

1.3

0.7–2.5

0.384

1.2

0.6–2.3

0.682

E2F2 (high vs. low)

2.0

1.3–3.2

0.002

2.4

1.3–4.2

0.004

  1. OS Overall survival, T = topography distribution, N = lymph node metastasis; M = distant metastasis, CI Confidence interval