Skip to main content

Table 4 Correlation between pregnant outcomes and clinicopathological indexes in patients after fertility-sparing surgery

From: Staging procedures fail to benefit women with borderline ovarian tumours who want to preserve fertility: a retrospective analysis of 448 cases

 

Fertility outcome

P value

No

(n,%)

Yes

(n,%)

Staging surgery

 No

124 (87.9)

79 (85.9)

0.691

 Yes

17 (12.1)

13 (14.1)

 

Surgical approach

 Laparoscopy

65 (46.1)

37 (40.2)

0.419

 Laparotomy

76 (53.9)

55 (59.8)

 

Surgical procedure

 Cystectomy

76 (53.9)

41 (44.6)

0.181

 Salpingo-oophorectomy

65 (46.1)

51 (55.4)

 

Adjuvant chemotherapy

 No

110 (78.0)

77 (83.7)

0.316

 Yes

31 (22.0)

15 (16.3)

 

FIGO Stage

 I

121 (85.8)

84 (91.3)

0.225

 ≧II

20 (14.2)

8 (8.7)

 

Histology

 Serous

79 (56.0)

39 (42.4)

0.08

 Mucinous

47 (33.3)

44 (47.8)

 

 Others

15 (10.6)

9 (9.8)

 

Lesion lateral

 Unilateral

122 (86.5)

82 (89.1)

0.686

 Bilateral

19 (13.5)

10 (10.9)

 

Micropapillary

 No

23 (16.3)

12 (13.0)

0.576

 Yes

118 (83.7)

80 (87.0)

 

Microinvasion

 No

126 (89.4)

85 (92.4)

0.499

 Yes

15 (10.6)

7 (7.6)

 

Carcinogenesis

 No

134 (95.0)

86 (93.5)

0.771

 Yes

7 (5.0)

6 (6.5)

 

Ascites/Pelvic washings

 Positive

7 (5.0)

3 (3.3)

0.744

 Negative

134 (95.0)

89 (96.7)

 

CA-125

 Normal

82 (65.6)

60 (69.8)

0.553

 Elevated

43 (34.4)

26 (30.2)

 

Invasive implants

 No

132 (93.6)

88 (95.7)

0.574

 Yes

9 (6.4)

4 (4.3)

 

Age

 < 35

107 (75.9)

92 (100)

0.000

 ≧35

34 (24.1)

0