Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of DFS

From: Staging procedures fail to benefit women with borderline ovarian tumours who want to preserve fertility: a retrospective analysis of 448 cases

 

Univariate

P value

Multivariate

P value

HR

95% confidence interval

HR

95% confidence interval

FIGO Stage

 I

1

     

 ≧II

7.204

4.093–12.680

0.000

6.544

2.137–20.041

0.001

Histology

 Serous

1

    

0.528

 Mucinous

0.353

0.171–0.726

0.005

1.215

0.275–5.375

0.797

 Others

0.286

0.069–1.183

0.084

0.632

0.130–3.066

0.569

Lesion lateral

 Unilateral

1

     

 Bilateral

2.554

1.460–4.469

0.001

1.076

0.526–2.202

0.840

Micropapillary

 Yes

1.557

0.831–2.917

0.167

   

 No

1

     

Microinvasion

 Yes

5.092

2.954–8.779

0.000

0.478

0.181–1.261

0.136

 No

1

     

Carcinogenesis

 Yes

1.049

0.327–3.366

0.936

  

NA

 No

1

     

Staging surgery

 Yes

2.191

1.263–3.801

0.005

0.810

0.393–1.669

0.567

 No

1

     

Adjuvant chemotherapy

 Yes

5.281

3.002–9.289

0.000

2.031

0.913–4.519

0.083

 No

1

     

Ascites/Pelvic washings

 Positive

5.442

2.850–10.391

0.000

3.259

1.202–8.835

0.020

 Negative

1

     

Surgical Approach

 Laparotomy

1

     

 Laparoscopy

0.292

0.132–0.647

0.002

0.319

0.128–0.793

0.014

CA-125

 Normal

1

     

 Elevated

2.201

1.224–3.960

0.008

0.825

0.422–1.611

0.572

Fertility sparing surgery

 No

1

     

 Yes

1.055

0.063–1.845

0.851

  

NA

Appendectomy

 No

1

     

 Yes

0.394

0.192–0.808

0.011

  

NA

Invasive implants

 No

1

     

 Yes

4.105

2.222–7.583

0.000

0.566

0.208–1.539

0.265