Skip to main content

Table 2 Meta-analyses of the correlation between LINC00511 expression and clinicopathological features

From: LINC00511 as a prognostic biomarker for human cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Variables

Number of studies

Number of patients

Model

OR

Heterogeneity

95% CI

p-value

I2 (%)

PH

Gender (Male vs. Female)

6

498

Random

0.98 (0.53–1.85)

0.96

58

0.04

Age

 ≥45 vs. < 45

1

84

–

0.66 (0.28–1.59)

0.36

–

–

 ≥50 vs. < 50

6

462

Fixed

0.69 (0.47–1.01)

0.06

0

0.98

 ≥60 vs. < 60

1

140

–

0.72 (0.34–1.52)

0.39

–

–

 ≥65 vs. < 65

2

173

Fixed

0.59 (0.29–1.20)

0.15

0

0.89

Histological grade (poor vs. well and moderate)

8

725

Fixed

1.34 (0.97–1.85)

0.07

0

0.75

Histological tumor type (adenocarcinoma vs. squamous cell carcinoma)

3

300

Random

2.80 (0.58–13.59)

0.20

71

0.03

Tumor size (large vs. small)

11

916

Random

3.10 (1.97–4.86)

< 0.00001

50

0.03

Lymph node metastasis (positive vs. negative)

10

880

Fixed

3.11 (2.30–4.21)

<  0.00001

42

0.08

Clinical stage (late vs. early)

8

643

Fixed

3.95 (2.68–5.81)

< 0.00001

0

0.48

Distant metastasis (Yes vs. No)

3

215

Fixed

2.39 (1.16–4.93)

0.02

21

0.28

Recurrence (Yes vs. No)

3

274

Fixed

4.62 (2.47–8.65)

< 0.00001

0

0.66

  1. Abbreviations: OR Odd ratio, PHP-value of heterogeneity