Skip to main content

Table 3 Meta-analysis of the studies reporting the association between over-expressed SNHG16 and clinicopathological parameters

From: Clinicopathological significance and prognosis of long noncoding RNA SNHG16 expression in human cancers: a meta-analysis

Clinicopathological parameters

Studies

Patients

Model

OR (95% CI)

P value

Heterogeneity

I2(%)

χ2

P-value

Smoking (yes vs no)

4

296

Fixed

1.175 (0.744–1.854)

0.489

8.3

3.27

0.351

Sex (male vs female)

12

1051

Fixed

1.286 (0.766–1.277)

0.932

0.0

5.05

0.929

Distant metastasis (yes vs no)

5

362

Random

3.033 (0.991–9.281)

0.052

78.8

18.89

0.001

Lymph node metastasis (yes vs no)

9

777

Random

1.923 (0.781–4.735)

0.155

83.8

49.38

0.000

Tumor number (multiple vs single)

2

378

Fixed

0.829 (0.531–1.293)

0.409

0.0

0.01

0.910

Tumor size (≥5 cm vs<5 cm)

5

373

Fixed

3.357 (2.173–5.185)

0

0.0

1.57

0.813

TNM stage (III/IV vs I/II)

8

591

Random

2.930 (1.522–5.640)

0.001

64.2

19.58

0.007

Histological grade (poorly vs well/moderately)

3

187

Fixed

3.943 (1.955–7.952)

0

13.8

2.32

0.313

  1. Abbreviations: OR odd ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval