Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of 5-FU and oxaliplatin-based therapy as second-line therapy

From: Meta-analysis examining overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with second-line 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin-based therapy after failing first-line gemcitabine-containing therapy: effect of performance status and comparison with other regimens

Treatment

Author/year

N

Weighted PS

Original PS

Prior surgery (%)

Deaths

Median OS (m)

ORR (%)

OFF

Pelzer 2009 [28]

37

1.5

KS: Median: 70, range: [60, 90]

43

33

5.1

6

OFF

Pelzer 2011 [27]

23

1.3

KS: Median: 80, range: [70, 100]

NR

18

4.8

0

OFF

Oettle 2014 [14]

76

1.2

KS: (90–100) (53.9%), 70–80 (46.1%)

45

73

5.9

17

5-FU/OXA-based

Tsavaris 2005 [29]

30

1.7

KS: (80–100) (33.4%), 70–50 (66.7%)

NR

20

5.7

23

FOLFOX

Gebbia 2007 [30]

42

1.4

ECOG: 1 (62%), 2 (38%)

9

38

6.7

14

FOLFOX

Yoo 2009 [31]

30

1.0

ECOG: 0–1 (97%)

32

25

3.8

7

FOLFOX

Zaanan 2014 [24]

12

1.0

ECOG: 0–1 (100%)

0

10

5.9

0

FOLFOX

Zaanan 2014 [24]

12

2.5

ECOG: 2–3 (100%)

0

12

2.6

0

FOLFOX

Gill 2016 [16]

54

1.1

ECOG: 0–1 (89%), 2 (11%)

NR

47

6.1

13

FOLFOX

Berk 2012 [32]

46

1.2

ECOG: 0–1 (78%), 2 (22%)

NR

33.6

6.2

17

OFF

El-Hadaad 2013 [33]

30

1.2

ECOG: 0–1 (83.4%), 2 (16%)

NR

29

5.1

7

FOLFOX

Chung 2017 [15]

62

1.0

ECOG: 0–1 (100%)

NR

53

6.7

11

  1. Abbreviations: 5-FU 5-fluorouracil, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, FOLFOX leucovorin/5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin, m months, KS Karnofsky status, NR not reported, OFF oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, ORR overall response rate, OS overall survival, OXA oxaliplatin, PS performance score