Skip to main content

Table 2 Studies reporting lymphedema prevalence or incidence

From: Prevalence and incidence of cancer related lymphedema in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Sample size

Stage of Diagnosis

Treatment received

Measurement method

Lymphedema definition

Prevalence or Incidence

Risk factors

Quality of Article

Breast Cancer

 (Yılmaz and Coşkun 2019) [23], Turkey

N = 64

Stage I-III

Breast cancer surgery

Self-reported and arm circumference

> 1.5 cm difference and lymphedema severity was defined as mild (if the difference between the extremities measurement is less than 3 cm), moderate (3–5 cm) and severe (> 5 cm)

14/64 (21.9%)

BMI and hand dominance

High risk

 (Kibar, Dalyan Aras et al. 2017) [25], Turkey

N = 287

…

Modified Radical Mastectomy or Lumpectomy; Chemotherapy and/or Radiotherapy

Arm circumference

≥2 cm difference

119/287 (41.3%)

Axillary radiotherapy and ALND

Low risk

(Erdogan Iyigun, Selamoglu et al. 2015) [26], Turkey

N = 37

Stages 0-II

Surgery

Bioimpedance, clinical diagnosis, arm circumference

Impedance ratio > 10

8/37 (21.1%)

Age, surgical procedure, tumor localization, systemic treatment, body mass index, and lymphedema

High risk

(KÄ°Bar, Aras et al. 2015) [27], Turkey

N = 190

…

Level III ALND subsequent to a modified radical mastectomy or lumpectomy together with chemotherapy or radiotherapy

Arm circumference

≥2 cm difference

79/190 (41.5%)

Age, BMI, chemotherapy

High risk

(Ay, Kutun et al. 2014) [28], Turkey

N = 5064

Stage I & II

Mastectomy

Arm circumference

> 5 cm difference

1008/5064 (19.9%)

Employment status, Age, BMI, post-operative chemotherapy treatment. Post axillary radiotherapy was not significant

Low risk

(Ozcinar, Guler et al. 2012) [29], Turkey

N = 221

Stage I, II, cT1, 2 N0

Surgery

Arm circumference

> 2 cm difference

16/221 (7.2%)

Type of the surgical procedure done, RT to regional lymphatics, ALND and RT Administration to axilla

Low risk

(Ozaslan and Kuru 2004) [30], Turkey

N = 240

Stage I-III

Surgery

Arm circumference

> 4 cm difference

68/240 (28%)

Axillary radiotherapy; BMI

Low risk

(Rebegea, Firescu et al. 2015) [21], Romania

N = 305

Stages I-IV

Surgery

Arm circumference

≥2 cm difference

18/305 (5.9%)

number of lymph nodes removed; stage of the disease; chemotherapy and hormonal therapy

Low risk

(Borman, Yaman et al. 2018) [51], Brazil

N = 135

Post breast cancer related with no advanced malignancy

…

Volume measurement

> 10% volume difference

125/135 (92.5%)

…

High risk

(Vieira, Silva et al. 2018) [32], Brazil

N = 16

ECOG scores of 0 to 1

Radiotherapy

Arm circumference

≥200 mm difference

4/16 (25%)

…

High risk

(Borman, Yaman et al. 2017) [51],

Brazil

N = 188

Subclinical, reversible, spontaneous irreversible, elephantiasis and stages I-III with mean time past after the surgery was 21.5 ± 27.5 months

Surgery

Self-reported arm swelling, arm circumferences

A positive Stemmer’s sign

170/188 (90%)

Lymphedema awareness

High risk

(Godoy, Dias et al. 2014) [33], Brazil

N = 1583

…

Surgery

Self-reported arm LE

Swelling of the arm

12/1583 (0.8%) suffered LE; 12/32 (37.5%) suffered LE due to axillary dissection

…

High risk

(Paiva, Rodrigues et al. 2013) [34], Brazil

N = 250

…

Surgery (more than 6 months)

Perimetry

≥2 cm difference

112/250 (44.8%)

ALND; SLNB; time after surgery

Low risk

(do Nascimento, de Oliveira et al. 2012) [24], Brazil

N = 707

Stages I-IV (presented with overweight, diabetic, hypertensive and shoulder dysfunction)

Surgery

Self-reported LE and perimetry

Swelling of the arm

164/707 (23.2%)

…

High risk

(de Godoy, Barufi et al. 2012) [35], Brazil

N = 35

…

Breast cancer treatment

Self-reported presence of chest swelling; Bioimpedance

> 100 g difference

4/35 (11.42%)

…

High risk

(Campanholi, Duprat et al. 2011) [20], Brazil

N = 84

…

Surgery

Arm and leg circumference; volume measurement; self-reported

> 10% difference in volume; 0–10% = normal, 10.1–20% = mild, 20.1–40% = moderate, 40.1–80% = marked, > 80.1% = severe in the arms and classified in the leg as 0–6.5% = normal, 6.6–20% = mild, 20.1–40% = moderate and > 40.1% = severe

7/40 (17.5%) in the arm; 26/44 (59.1%) in the lower limb

Local lymphadenecto-my including axillary, inguinal and ilioinguinal

High risk

(Bergmann, Bourrus et al. 2011) [36], Brazil

N = 220

Stages IIA, IIB, IIIA and IIIB

Advanced Breast Cancer Treatment

Self-report, volumetric measurement

> 200 ml difference in volume

13/220 (6.6%)

Obstruction of lymphatic drainage and clinical stage of the condition; Radiotherapy and chemotherapy and delay in accessing neo-adjuvant therapy

Low risk

(Velloso, Barra et al. 2011) [37], Brazil

N = 45

…

Surgery (21.3 months)

Arm circumference

> 10% difference

2/45 (4.4%)

…

High risk

(Alem and Gurgel 2008) [38], Brazil

N = 29

Post-surgery with mean time for breast cancer 86.1 ± 81.6 months.

Breast Cancer Surgery

Arm circumference

≥2 cm difference; a restriction of 20° or more in flexion and/or abduction in ROM.

23/29 (79.0%)

…

High risk

(Paim, Lima et al. 2008) [5], Brazil

N = 96

…

Surgery

Arm circumference/ perimetry and Clinical diagnosis

> 1 cm and any two of lymphedema symptoms of limb heaviness, swelling, tightness or firmness

17/96 (17%) and the prevalence with treatment; ALND 14/48 (29.2%) and SLNB 2/48 (4.2%)

ALND; SLNB

Low risk

(Batiston and Santiago 2005) [39], Brazil

N = 160

Stage I - IV

Radical surgery (68.8%) and conservative surgery (31.2%)

Self-reported swelling

…

47/160 (29.2%)

Time after surgery to physiotherapy rehabilitation

High risk

(Elumelu-Kupoluyi, Adenipekun et al. 2013) [40], Nigeria

N = 63

Stage II

Radiotherapy

Clinical diagnosis

A positive stemmer’s sign

55/63 (78%) in the arm.

…

High risk

(Khanna, Gupta et al. 2019) [41], India

N = 98

Locally advanced (IIIB) and Early/palpable stage (I-IIIA)

Breast carcinoma treatment; Mastectomy and Wide local incision

Arm circumference

≥2 cm difference in limb between pre-op and post-op measurements

23/98 (23.5%)

Drainage of seroma, type of treatment especially axillary radiotherapy and skin necrosis, chemotherapy

Low risk

(Rastogi, Jain et al. 2018) [42], India

N = 100

Stages IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB and IIIC

Mastectomy, Radiotherapy and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Arm circumference

≥2 cm difference

13/100 (13.0%) and 13/33 (39.4%) recorded by patients with BMI > 25

BMI; Number of lymph nodes removed; regional lymph node radiated

High risk

(Gopal, Acharya et al. 2017) [43], India

N = 199

Early and locally advanced stages

Radiotherapy, Lymph Node dissection, Surgery and Chemotherapy

Arm circumference

> 5% difference

85/199 (42.7%)

stage of cancer, BMI, receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy, number of lymph nodes removed

High risk

(Nandi, Mahata et al. 2014) [52],

India

N = 135

Grades I-IV

Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy and Mastectomy

Self-reported

…

9/135 (6.7%)

…

High risk

(Raja, Damke et al. 2014) [44], India

N = 30

Stage I and II

Modified Radical Mastectomy with Axillary Clearance

Self-reported

Lymphedema grading system of mild, moderate and severe

17/30 (56.7%)

…

High risk

(Deo, Ray et al. 2004) [45], India

N = 299

Stage I, II & III

Post Breast cancer treatment (Surgery & Radiotherapy)

Arm Circumference

> 3 cm

100/299 (33%)

Axillary irradiation; comorbidities.

Low risk

(Halder, Morewya et al. 2001) [46], Papua New Guinea (East Asia)

N = 790

Stages I-IV

Lumpectomy and Mastectomy

Self-reported

…

3/790 (0.4%)

…

High risk

(Haddad, Farzin et al. 2010) [54], Iran

N = 355

Cases of no evidence of recurrence or metastases after surgery

Surgery

Arm circumference and self-reported swelling

> 10% difference

63/355 (17.5%)

Type of surgery, treatment with radiotherapy, and prescription of a supraclavicular field of radiation

Low risk

(Honarvar, Sayar et al. 2016) [47], Iran

N = 683

…

Modified radical mastectomy, conservative surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy

Arm circumference

≥2 cm difference and a positive stemmer’s sign

400/683 (58.6%)

Type of surgery, treatment with radiotherapy, physical activity, modified radical mastectomy, BMI, hormone therapy, size of tumor, and number of excised or affected lymph nodes.

Low risk

(Morcos, Al Ahmad et al. 2013) [48], Jordan

N = 531

…

Surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy

Arm circumference

≥2 cm difference

114/531 (21.4%)

Surgery type received

High risk

Vulvar Cancer

(de Melo Ferreira, de Figueiredo et al. 2012) [49], Brazil

N = 50

Stage I-IV

Vulvectomy

Clinical diagnosis, observation and palpation by the clinician

Severity and limb functions considered based on disabilities reported

28/56 (50%); 17/28 (60.7%) among cases and 3/28 (10.7%) among the control

Severity and BMI

High risk

(Eke, Alabi-Isama et al. 2010) [53], Nigeria

N = 11

Stages IB-IV

Vulvar carcinoma surgery

Self-reported LLE

…

1/11 (9.1%)

…

High risk

Cervical Cancer

(Marin, PleÅŸca et al. 2014) [50], Romania

N = 324

…

Lymphadenohysterocolpectomy; Radical hysterectomy

Self-reported

…

37/324 (11.4%);

lower limb lymphedema (13.5% III vs 11.5% II)

…

High risk

(Elumelu-Kupoluyi, Adenipekun et al. 2013) [40], Nigeria

N = 63

Stage II

Radiotherapy

Clinical diagnosis

A positive stemmer’s sign

8/63 (13%) in the leg

…

High risk

(Dem, Kasse et al. 2001), Senegal [22]

N = 86

Stages I-IV

Cervical cancer treatment

Self-reported

…

6/86 (6.98%) in the leg

…

High risk