Skip to main content

Table 1 The main features of the included studies for miR-106 family in the diagnosis of CRC

From: Biomarker roles identification of miR-106 family for predicting the risk and poor survival of colorectal cancer

First author

Year

Country

Ethnicity

Case

Control

Sample source

Methods

miRNA

AUC

Sensitivity

Specificity

M

F

N

Age

M

F

N

Age

Kuriyama et al. [37]

2012

Japan

Asian

NA

NA

138

NA

NA

NA

126

NA

Feces

RT-PCR

miR-106a

0.826

37.70%

99.20%

Luo et al. [21]

2013

Germany

European

45

35

80

68

60

84

144

62

Plasma

RT-PCR

miR-106b

0.565

19.00%

95.00%

Koga et al. [20]

2013

Japan

Asian

69

48

117

65

66

41

107

60

Feces

RT-PCR

miR-106a

NA

34.20%

97.20%

Chen et al. [22]

2015

China

Asian

60

40

100

60

44

35

79

60

Plasma

RT-PCR

miR-106a

0.605

74.00%

44.40%

Li et al. [23]

2015

China

Asian

113

62

175

57

51

79

130

54

Serum

RT-PCR

miR-106a

0.813

69.00%

83.00%

He et al. [24]

2017

China

Asian

23

19

42

63

24

18

42

60

Plasma

RT-PCR

miR-106a

0.858

74.20%

86.10%

  1. M male, F female, N number, AUC area under the curve