Skip to main content

Table 2 Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for alcohol consumption and mortality of esophageal cancer by histological type

From: Dietary factors and risk of mortality among patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review

Study ID a

Crude

HR (95% CI) b

Adjusted

HR (95% CI) b

Heterogeneity for

pooled crude HR

Heterogeneity for

pooled adjusted HR

I2 (%)

P

I2 (%)

P

EC

  

/

/

4.2

0.352

 Huang et al. [27]

 

1.46 (1.19,1.79)

    

 Samadi et al. [33]

 

7.51 (0.82, 69.10)

    

 Park et al. [28]

 

1.44 (0.81, 2.55)

    

pooled estimates

 

1.48 (1.19, 1.84)

    

ESCC

  

77.8

0.001

66.9

0.010

 Huang et al. [27]

 

1.37 (1.11, 1.70)

    

 Ma et al. [15]

 

1.58 (1.21, 2.07)

    

 Shitara et al. [26]

0.87 (0.65, 1.17)

0.85 (0.61, 1.18)

    

 Sundelof et al. [14]

 

0.60 (0.30, 1.40)

    

 Thrift et al. [29]

2.51 (1.63, 3.85)

2.08 (1.18, 3.69)

    

 Trivers et al. [23]

1.77 (0.93, 3.35)

     

 Wu et al. [32]

 

1.30 (1.01, 1.67)

    

 Jing et al. [25]

1.42 (0.83, 1.84)

     

 Lu et al. [24]

1.02 (0.61, 1.72)

     

pooled estimates

1.27 (1.06, 1.53)

1.26(1.01, 1.60)

    

EAC

  

/

/

0.0

0.960

 Sundelof et al. [14]

 

1.00 (0.50, 1.70)

    

 Thrift et al. [31]

 

1.02 (0.64, 1.64)

    

 Trivers et al. [23]

1.08 (0.81, 1.44)

     

pooled estimates

 

1.01 (0.70, 1.47)

    
  1. aEC esophageal cancer, ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, EAC esophageal adenocarcinoma, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
  2. b The effect was estimated by comparing the highest with the lowest consumption of alcohol