Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies and quality score

From: Dietary factors and risk of mortality among patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review

Author, reference, year,

country

Sources of cohort patients

Follow-up duration (years)

Number and type of patients

Stage/grade grouping

Exposure

Dietary assessments

Comparison categories

Adjusted HR (95% CI)

(highest vs. lowest) for mortality

Adjustments

NOS stars

Petrick et al. [13], 2015, USA

Population-based case–control study

Max: 7.5

Mediana:

0.8 for EAC,

0.9 for ESCC

274 EAC

191 ESCC

Primary invasive cases:

localized, regional, distant, unknown

Total flavonoids, six classes of flavonoids (anthocyanidins, flavan-3-ols, flavanones, flavones, flavanols, and isoflavones), lignans

A 104-item modified FFQ

Each were divided into 4 categories (mg/day):

Total flavonoids:

0–62.35,

62.36–103.39,

103.40–253.24, ≥253.25;

Anthocyanidins:

0–6.23,

6.24–10.11,

10.12–16.23,

≥16.24;

Flavan-3-ols:

0–10.90,

10.91–26.67,

26.68–210.51, ≥210.52;

Flavanones:

0–8.63,

8.64–32.94,

34.95–49.00,

≥49.01;

Flavones:

0–1.20,

1.21–1.81,

1.82–2.64,

≥2.65;

Flavonols:

0–8.16,

8.17–12.30,

12.31–19.34,

≥19.35;

Isoflavones:

0–0.31,

0.32–0.46,

0.47–0.62,

≥0.63;

Lignans:

0–0.044,

0.045–0.060,

0.061–0.079,

≥0.080

All-cause mortality

For EAC:

Total flavonoids:

0.98 (0.68, 1.41);

Anthocyanidins:

0.87 (0.60, 1.26);

Flavan-3-ols:

0.93 (0.65, 1.33);

Flavanones:

1.15 (0.79, 1.68);

Flavones:

0.83 (0.58, 1.19);

Flavonols:

0.94 (0.65, 1.37);

Isoflavones:

0.75 (0.49, 1.13);

Lignans:

0.78 (0.54, 1.14)

For ESCC:

Total flavonoids:

0.91 (0.58, 1.44);

Anthocyanidins:

2.272 (0.66, 1.56);

Flavan-3-ols:

1.09 (0.69, 1.74);

Flavanones:

1.24 (0.76, 2.03);

Flavones:

2.272 (0.64, 1.54);

Flavonols:

0.93 (0.61, 1.40);

Isoflavones:

0.97 (0.60, 1.58);

Lignans:

0.61 (0.39, 0.96)

Cancer stage and dietary energy intake

7

Miles et al. [12], 2016, USA

Population-based case–control study

Median: 12.1

108 EC

74 EAC

Well differentiated, Poorly differentiated, Undetermined

Sugary beverages including soft drinks and fruit juices (classified into SB1 and SB2b)

NCI-block FFQ

Median for soft drinks and fruit juices(g/day):

soft drinks:4.0;

fruit juices:0.71

SB1 intake quartile point(g/day):

(Q1)0.71,

(Q2)11.81,

(Q3) 40.00;

SB2 intake quartile points(g/day)

(Q1)3.04,

(Q2)20.76,

(Q3)45.29

All-cause mortality

For EC:

soft drinks:

2.29 (1.32,3.93);

fruit juices:

2.39 (1.34,4.30);

SB1:

2.58 (1.45,4.60);

SB2:

1.94 (1.06,3.53)

For EAC:

soft drinks:

1.84 (0.92,3.68);

fruit juices:

1.60 (0.79,3.25);

SB1:

1.51 (0.72,3.16);

SB2:

1.44 (0.57,3.62)

Age, sex, ethnicity, education, smoking, alcohol drinking, caloric intake, pathology type, and tumor differentiation grade

8

Shi et al. [30], 2018, China

A new established patient cohort

Median: 4.08

185 ESCC

AJCC stage: Only included I and II stage

Preserved vegetables

A modified FFQ

2 categories (time/week):

< 1 and ≥ 1

All-cause mortality

1.58 (1.01,2.47)

Age and sex

7

Lu et al. [24], 2011, China

A new established patient cohort

Median: 3.5, (Min-Max: 0.03–4.66)

120 ESCC patients underwent esophagectomy

T stage: T1~T4

N stage: N0, N1

M stage: M0, M1

clinical stage: 1/2, 3/4

Folate

NIH-modified FFQ

3 categories(ug/day):

< 30.0,

30.0–95.4,

≥95.5

Cancer-specific mortality

0.39 (0.20,0.78)

Age, sex, TNM stage

7

Jing et al. [25], 2012, China

A new established patient cohort

Median: 3.25,

(Min-Max: 0.25–5)

167 ESCC

T stage: T1~T4

N stage: N0, N1

M stage: M0, M1

Folate

A 65-item self-administered structured questionnaire

3 categories(ug/day):

< 230,

230–300,

> 300

Cancer-specific mortality:

0.45 (0.18,0.87)

Age, sex, smoking, drinking, tumor sites, TNM stage, chemo-therapy and radio-therapy

6

Trivers et al. [23], 2005, USA

population- based, case-control study

Max: 7.5

Median a:

0.8 for EAC and 0.9 for ESCC

293 EAC

220 ESCC

Incident invasive cases: localized, regional, distant, unknown

Alcohol

Baseline interviews

2 categories:

non-drinkers

and ever drinkers c

All-cause mortality d:

EAC:

1.08 (0.81,1.44)

ESCC:

1.77 (0.93,3.35)

None

7

Park et al. [28], 2006, South Korea

A cohort of male participated in a national health examination program

Mean:2.05 (Max:6.8)

272 EC

Not collected

Alcohol

A self-administered questionnaire

3 categories(g of alcohol/week):

0,

0–124.1,

≥124.2

All-cause mortality

1.44 (0.81,2.55)

Age, BMI, fasting serum glucose level, cholesterol level, physical activity, food preference, blood pressure, and other comorbidities

5

Samadi et al. [33], 2007, Iran

Patients initially diagnosed in Aras Clinic

Max: 5

122 EC

Differentiation:well, moderate/ poor, nondifferentiated

Alcohol

Questionnaire completed at the time of diagnosis

2 categories: no and yes

All-cause mortality:

7.51(0.82,69.10)

Age, sex, residence, treatment, smoking, opium use, differentiation, education

4

Sundelof et al. [14], 2008, Sweden

Nationwide case-control study

From 1994.12.1–1997.12.31 to 2004.12.31

177 EAC

159 ESCC

TNM stage: I, II, III, IV

Alcohol (including beer, wine and liquor)

Computer-aided face-to-face interview with separate questions

4 categories(g of pure alcohol/week): never, 1–15, 16–70, > 70

All-cause mortality

EAC:1.0 (0.5,1.7)

ESCC:0.6 (0.3,1.4)

Age, sex, educational level, symptomatic reflux, BMI, smoking, physical activity, tumor stage and for esophagectomy

8

Shitara et al. [26], 2010, Japan

Patients in Aichi Cancer Center Hospital

Median:5.6 (Min-Max: 2.1–7.9)

363 ESCC

UICC stage: I, II, III, IV

Alcohol

HERPACC questionnaire

2 categoriese (g of ethanol/week): <230 and ≥ 230

All-cause mortality

0.85(0.61,1.18)

Age, sex, smoking, ECOG PS, tumor length, UICC stage, treatment

7

Lu et al. [24], 2011, China

A new established patient cohort

Median: 3.5, (Min-Max: 0.03–4.66).

120 ESCC patients underwent esophagectomy

T stage: T1~T4

N stage: N0, N1

M stage: M0, M1

clinical stage: 1/2, 3/4

Alcohol

Risk factor questionnaire

2 categories:

Never drinkers and ever drinkers

Cancer-specific mortality:

1.02(0.61–1.72)

None

6

Jing et al. [25], 2012, China

Patients in General Hospital of Chengdu Military Area

Median:

3.25

(Min-Max: 0.25–5)

167 ESCC

T stage: T1~T4

N stage: N0, N1

M stage: M0, M1

Alcohol

A 65-item self-administered structured questionnaire

4 categoriesf (g of ethanol/week): never, former, moderate, heavy

Cancer-specific mortality: 1.42(0.83,1.84)

None

5

Thrift et al. [29], 2012, Australia

Population-based case-control study

Median: 6.4

(Min-Max: 4.8–8.9)

301 ESCC

AJCC stage: I, II, III, IV

Alcohol (including light beer, regular beer, white wine, red wine, port/sherry and spirits/liqueur)

A health and life style questionnaire

4 categories(g of ethanol/week) < 10, 10–60, 70–200, ≥210

All-cause mortality ESCC:

2.08 (1.18,3.69);

Age, sex, AJCC stage, treatment intent, number of comorbidities and smoking

7

Thrift et al. [31], 2012, Australia

Population-based case-control study

Median: 6.4

(Min-Max: 4.8–8.9)

362 EAC

AJCC stage: I, II, III, IV

Alcohol (including light beer, regular beer, white wine, red wine, port/sherry and spirits/liqueur)

A health and life style questionnaire

4 categories(g of ethanol/week)

< 10, 10–60, 70–200, ≥210

All-cause mortality

EAC: 1.02(0.64,1.64)

Age, sex, AJCC stage, treatment intent, number of comorbidities and smoking

7

Wu et al. [32], 2013, China

Hospital-based case-control study

Max: 5

718 ESCC

AJCC stage: I + II, III + IV

Alcohol

A standardized questionnaire

2 categoriesg:

users and non-users

All-cause mortality: 1.30(1.01,1.67);

Age, sex, education levels and AJCC stages

8

Huang et al. [27], 2014, China

Prospectively created esophageal carcinoma database

Median:5.3

2151EC

1851 ESCC,

AJCC stage: 0 + I, II, III

Alcohol (including wine, spirit and beer)

Baseline interviews

4 categoriesh (g of alcohol/week):

0, 0–90.09, 91–272.09, ≥273

All-cause mortality d:

EC: 1.46(1.19,1.79)

ESCC: 1.37(1.11,1.70)

Age, sex, weight loss, stage, radicality of surgery, adjuvant treatment, smoking

7

Ma et al. [15], 2016, China

Esophageal cancer database of the Department of Thoracic Surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

Median: 6.5 (Min-Max:1–20)

643 ESCC with negative lymphatic metastasis having undergone esophagectomy

Post-operation staging of AJCC stage: IA, IB, IIA

Alcohol

Medical records

2 categoriesi:

non-drinkers and drinkers

All-cause mortality d:

1.58(1.21,2.07)

Age, sex, smoking, family history, tumor location, surgery technique, post-operation staging, tumor grade

7

  1. HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, NOS the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality assessment scale, EC esophageal cancer, EAC esophageal adenocarcinoma, ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, FFQ food frequency questionnaire, NCI National Cancer Institute, NIH National Institutes of Health, BMI body mass index, Min minimum, Max maximum, TNM tumor node metastasis, HERPACC Hospital-based Epidemiologic Research Program at Aichi Cancer Center, ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer, UICC Union for International Cancer Control
  2. a Data of median survival time. Survival time in this article was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis to the date of death or last follow-up, same as the time of follow-up
  3. b SB1, Sugars from soft drinks and fruit juices (g/day); SB2, Sugars from soft drinks, fruit juices, and sugar added to tea, coffee or cereal (g/day)
  4. c Ever drinkers defined as those who had ≥1 alcoholic drink (12 oz. beer, 4 oz. glass of wine, 1 drink with hard liquor) per month for ≥6 months
  5. d The outcome was overall survival (OS) defined as the time from diagnosis through death from any causes. Calculated HR was the same as that of all-cause mortality
  6. e Calculated according to definition of drinking group in this article. It divided alcohol intake into 2 categories: non-heavy drinkers and heavy drinkers
  7. f Former drinkers were those who quit drinking more than 1 year, heavy drinkers were those who drank alcoholic beverages ≥250 g of ethanol/week while moderate drinkers were defined as drinkers consuming < 250 and > 0 g of ethanol/week
  8. g Users were defined as those who consumed alcoholic drinks ≥1 time /week for ≥6 months
  9. h Calculated according to definition of drinking group in this article. It divided alcohol intake into 4 categories: non-drinkers, light drinkers, moderate drinkers and heavy drinkers
  10. i Patients with a present or past history of alcohol consumption were referred to as drinkers