Skip to main content

Table 3 Genetic association analysis for the ESR1, HER2, UGT1A4, and UGT2B7 SNPs using different genetic models

From: Association between ESR1, ESR2, HER2, UGT1A4, and UGT2B7 polymorphisms and breast Cancer in Jordan: a case-control study

Gene

SNP ID

Category Test

Odds Ratio

95% CI

Chi square*

ESR1

rs2234693

Het (GT) vs Common Hz (GG)

0.65

0.41–1.04

3.31

Rare Hz (TT) vs Het (GT)

1.59

0.99–2.55

3.7

Rare Hz (TT) vs Common Hz (GG)

1.04

0.6–1.79

0.02

rs9340799

Het (AG) vs Common Hz (AA)

0.69

0.44–1.08

2.67

Rare Hz (GG) vs Het (AG)

1.69

1.03–2.77

4.29

Rare Hz (GG) vs Common Hz (AA)

1.16

0.67–2.03

0.28

rs3020410

Het (CT) vs Common Hz (CC)

1.21

0.72–2.04

0.53

Rare Hz (TT) vs Het (AG)

1.26

0.2–8.01

0.06

Rare Hz (TT) vs Common Hz (CC)

1.52

0.25–9.23

0.21

rs3798577

Het (GT) vs Common Hz (GG)

0.61

0.4–0.95

4.88

Rare Hz (TT) vs Het (GT)

0.93

0.57–1.53

0.07

Rare Hz (TT) vs Common Hz (GG)

0.57

0.33–0.98

4.16

HER2

rs1058808

Het (GA) vs Common Hz (GG)

1.18

0.8–1.76

0.7

Rare Hz (AA) vs Het (GA)

0.71

0.37–1.35

1.1

Rare Hz (AA) vs Common Hz (GG)

0.84

0.44–1.59

0.29

UGT1A4

rs6755571

Het (GA) vs Common Hz (AA)

1.27

0.67–2.39

0.55

Rare Hz (GG) vs Het (GA)

0.4

0.03–4.7

0.57

Rare Hz (GG) vs Common Hz (AA)

0.5

0.05–5.59

0.33

UGT2B7

rs28365062

Het (CT) vs Common Hz (CC)

0.87

0.57–1.35

0.37

Rare Hz (TT) vs Het (CT)

1.09

0.38–3.12

0.03

Rare Hz (TT) vs Common Hz (CC)

0.96

0.35–2.61

0.01

rs4348159

Het (CT) vs Common Hz (CC)

0.89

0.58–1.38

0.25

Rare Hz (TT) vs Het (CT)

1.21

0.43–3.37

0.13

Rare Hz (TT) vs Common Hz (CC)

1.08

0.41–2.88

0.03

  1. * For significant association χ2 should be > 3.84 with P < 0.025
  2. CI indicates confidence interval