Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing prostate Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 2 Diagnostic performance of prebiopsy multiparametric MRI using biopsy findings as reference

Author	Prevalence	Reporting Level	Tn	Fn	Tp	Fp	Sensitivity	Specificity	NPV
Jagannathan(2017)	0.73	Patient	6	6	17	1	0.89	0.86	0.50
Popita(2017)	0.57	Patient	19	0	16	4	1.00	0.83	1.00
Gaunry(2016)	0.48	Patient	41	24	376	72	0.94	0.36	0.63
Brock(2015)	0.58	Patient	17	7	56	88	0.89	0.16	0.71
Hauth(2015)	0.42	Patient	6	1	42	45	0.98	0.12	0.86
Panebianco(2015)	0.45	Patient	104	43	186	22	0.81	0.83	0.71
Pepe(2015)	0.54	Lobe	24	6	49	4	0.89	0.86	0.80
Radtke(2015)	0.51	Patient	138	78	72	6	0.48	0.96	0.63
Thompson(2015)	0.61	Patient	74	6	137	127	0.96	0.37	0.92
Wang(2015)	1.00	Patient	200	8	332	53	0.98	0.79	0.96
Alazeez(2014)	0.16	Patient	33	14	127	84	0.90	0.28	0.70
Javali(2014)	0.64	Lobe	49	1	22	68	0.96	0.42	0.98
Matsuoka(2014)	0.37	Patient	46	49	149	26	0.75	0.64	0.48
Petrillo(2014)	0.18	Patient	56	4	21	55	0.84	0.50	0.93
Pokorny(2014)	0.63	Patient	56	25	101	0	0.80	1.00	0.69
Porpiglia(2014)	0.30	Patient	107	5	47	11	0.90	0.91	0.95
Busetto(2013)	0.41	Patient	59	7	61	36	0.90	0.62	0.89
Ferda(2013)	0.51	Patient	52	2	82	28	0.98	0.65	0.96
Kuru(2013)	0.57	Patient	80	14	67	186	0.83	0.30	0.85
Numao(2013)	0.45	Patient	136	57	101	56	0.64	0.71	0.70
Ibrahiem(2012)	0.73	Patient	14	11	57	10	0.84	0.58	0.56
Portalez(2012)	0.48	Lesion	404	47	34	47	0.42	0.90	0.89
Watanabe(2012)	0.48	Patient	485	73	624	266	0.90	0.65	0.86
Haffner(2011)	0.54	Patient	154	50	240	111	0.83	0.58	0.75
Rouse(2011)	0.33	Sextant	145	11	74	72	0.87	0.67	0.92
Kitajima(2010)	0.56	Patient	311	19	80	14	0.81	0.96	0.94
Labanaris(2010)	0.73	Patient	17	73	96	74	0.57	0.19	0.18
Sciarra(2010)	0.34	Patient	61	4	66	9	0.94	0.87	0.93
Kumar(2009)	0.21	Patient	39	3	10	8	0.77	0.83	0.92

ISSN: 1471-2407