Skip to main content

Table 4 Subgroup analysis of the PSM cohort (n = 220)

From: Efficacy of capecitabine and oxaliplatin versus S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer after D2 lymph node dissection according to lymph node ratio and N stage

 

number of patients

Overall survival

Disease-free survival

5-year OS % (95% CI)

HR(95% CI)

p value*

5-year DFS % (95% CI)

HR(95% CI)

p value*

S-1

XELOX

S-1

XELOX

Sex

 Male

152

73 (63–84)

78 (68–90)

0.63 (0.32–1.27)

0.196

66 (56–78)

77 (67–88)

0.60 (0.32–1.14)

0.117

 Female

68

71 (57–89)

76 (59–97)

0.93 (0.35–2.48)

0.890

64 (49–83)

68 (49–94)

0.75 (0.32–1.77)

0.507

Age (years)

  < 65

138

78 (68–88)

87 (79–96)

0.66 (0.29–1.50)

0.316

71 (61–83)

77 (67–90)

0.73 (0.36–1.44)

0.361

  ≥ 65

82

62 (48–80)

64 (48–85)

0.69 (0.32–1.51)

0.358

56 (42–74)

69 (55–87)

0.55 (0.261–1.18)

0.125

Stage (AJCC 7th)

 IIA

7

100 (100–100)

100 (100–100)

NA

NA

100 (100–100)

100 (100–100)

NA

NA

 IIB

40

89 (64–97)

92 (57–99)

0.67 (0.06–7.48)

0.747

85 (61–95)

92 (54–99)

0.38(0.04–3.68)

0.405

 IIIA

54

89 (70–96)

75 (33–93)

1.56 (0.31–7.96)

0.593

85 (66–94)

77 (53–90)

1.58(0.43–5.76)

0.487

 IIIB

67

78 (65–94)

72 (55–94)

1.35 (0.50–3.69)

0.554

66 (51–85)

74 (60–92)

0.84 (0.34–2.04)

0.697

 IIIC

52

27 (10–46)

68 (51–90)

0.32 (0.14–0.76)

0.009

22 (8–41)

57 (39–84)

0.32 (0.15–0.70)

0.004

 All II

47

90 (78–100)

94 (83–100)

0.58 (0.05–6.40)

0.655

87(74–100)

93 (82–100)

0.35 (0.04–3.34)

0.360

 All III

173

67 (58–78)

73 (62–86)

0.73 (0.40–1.31)

0.285

60 (50–71)

69 (59–81)

0.67 (0.40–1.13)

0.133

N stage

 N0

18

100 (100–100)

100 (100–100)

NA

NA

100 (100–100)

100 (100–100)

NA

NA

 N1

33

93 (59–99)

81 (52–94)

3.40 (0.35–32.86)

0.290

87 (56–96)

80 (50–93)

1.81(0.30–10.96)

0.519

 N2

75

86 (71–94)

77 (42–92)

1.40 (0.36–5.41)

0.623

82 (65–91)

78 (57–90)

1.18(0.42–3.34)

0.757

 N3

94

47 (34–65)

71 (58–86)

0.45 (0.23–0.87)

0.019

38 (26–55)

66 (52–82)

0.40 (0.21–0.75)

0.004

T stage

 T1

7

100 (100–100)

100 (100–100)

NA

NA

75 (13–96)

100 (100–100)

0.42(0.00–41.43)

0.712

 T2

16

86 (33–98)

86 (33–98)

0.87 (0.05–13.85)

0.919

88 (39–98)

86 (33–98)

0.93(0.06–14.83)

0.957

 T3

80

80 (68–93)

81 (66–99)

0.75 (0.25–2.23)

0.604

74 (62–90)

80 (67–95)

0.78 (0.30–2.05)

0.617

 T4a,b

117

64 (52–78)

72 (59–88)

0.69 (0.35–1.37)

0.290

56 (42–68)

67 (50–79)

0.61 (0.33–1.14)

0.121

LNR group

 LNR 0

18

100 (100–100)

100 (100–100)

NA

NA

100 (100–100)

100 (100–100)

NA

NA

 LNR 1

71

94 (78–98)

86 (61–96)

3.01 (0.55–16.59)

0.205

88 (72–95)

85 (65–94)

1.43(0.41–4.99)

0.579

 LNR 2

80

74 (57–85)

72 (50–86)

0.84 (0.34–2.10)

0.705

66 (49–79)

74 (56–85)

0.73(0.32–1.68)

0.464

 LNR 3

51

26 (12–55)

67 (50–89)

0.28 (0.11–0.71)

0.020

20 (9–47)

54 (35–82)

0.29 (0.13–0.65)

0.004

  1. *The hazard ratio of the XELOX group using the S-1 group as the reference and the 95% CIs were calculated using Cox’s proportional hazards model
  2. †NA = not evaluable
  3. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio. Significant values are in boldface type