Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical findings of DEB-TACE group and cTACE group

From: Conventional versus drug-eluting beads chemoembolization for infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of efficacy and safety

Variables

DEB-TACE (n = 56)

cTACE (n = 33)

P value

Age (years)

55.3 ± 11.6

56.1 ± 12.6

0.934

Gender (male/female)

45/11

28/5

0.594

Tumor size (cm)

11.2 ± 6.6

10.7 ± 5.8

0.588

Cirrhotic etiology (HBV/HCV/alcohol/PBC)

49/5/2/0

27/3/2/1

0.624

ECOG ps (0/1 + 2)

18/38

11/22

0.908

Total bilirubin (umol/L)

24.5 ± 25.3

17.2 ± 9.0

0.055

Albumin (g/L)

35.5 ± 5.0

35.7 ± 3.9

0.206

Creatinine (umol/L)

70.8 ± 23.9

74.3 ± 20.9

0.403

Bilobar lesions (yes/no)

32/24

15/18

0.286

Ascites (yes/no)

26/30

11/22

0.226

Tumor burden (<50%/50–70%)

41/15

27/6

0.356

Child-Pugh class (A/B)

36/20

23/10

0.602

MELD score

8.4 ± 1.7

8.8 ± 1.8

0.901

BCLC staging (B/C)

8/48

5/28

1.000

PVTT (yes/no)

47/9

27/6

0.797

Distant metastasis (yes/no)

9/47

7/26

0.542

APS (yes/no)

40/16

23/10

0.862

Received sorafenib (yes/no)

3/53

2/31

1.000

  1. Note: DEB-TACE Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization, cTACE Conventional transarterial chemoembolization, HBV Hepatitis B virus, HCV Hepatitis C virus, PBC Primary biliary cirrhosis, ECOG ps Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, Meld Model for end-stage liver disease, BCLC Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, PVTT Portal venous tumor thrombus, APS Arterio-portal shunts