Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinicopathological findings of 837 patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer

From: Risk evaluation of splenic hilar or splenic artery lymph node metastasis and survival analysis for patients with proximal gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy: a retrospective study

 

N

NSR (n = 572)

CR (n = 152)

SPR (n = 113)

P

Gender

    

0.947

 Male

668

457 (68.4%)

120 (18.0%)

91 (13.6%)

 

 Female

169

115 (68.0%)

32 (18.9%)

22(13.0%)

 

Age

    

0.387

  < 60 years

460

306 (66.5%)

86 (18.7%)

68 (14.8%)

 

  ≥ 60 years

377

266 (70.6%)

66 (17.5%)

45 (11.9%)

 

Tumor size

    

< 0.001

  < 5 cm

358

264 (73.7%)

38 (10.6%)

56 (15.6%)

 

  ≥ 5 cm

479

308(64.3%)

114 (23.8%)

57 (11.9%)

 

Gastrectomy type

    

0.106

 Proximal

335

244 (72.8%)

52 (15.5%)

39 (11.6%)

 

 Total

502

328 (65.3%)

100 (19.9%)

74 (14.7%)

 

Greater curvature involved

   

< 0.001

 No

617

445 (72.1%)

91 (14.7%)

81 (13.1%)

 

 Yes

220

127 (57.7%)

61 (27.7%)

32 (14.5%)

 

pT stage

    

< 0.001

 pT2

96

75 (78.1%)

8 (8.3%)

13 (13.5%)

 

 pT3

282

212 (75.2%)

28 (9.9%)

42 (14.9%)

 

 pT4a

459

285 (62.1%)

116 (25.3%)

58 (12.6%)

 

pN stage

    

0.003

 pN0

266

198 (74.4%)

42 (15.8%)

26 (9.8%)

 

 pN1

149

106 (71.1%)

31(20.8%)

12 (8.1%)

 

 pN2

180

122 (67.8%)

26 (14.4%)

32 (17.8%)

 

 pN3a-3b

242

146 (60.3%)

53 (21.9%)

43 (17.8%)

 

pTNM stage

    

< 0.001

 IB-IIA

168

138 (82.1%)

12 (7.1%)

18 (10.7%)

 

 IIB-IIIA

432

293 (67.8%)

87 (20.1%)

52 (12.0%)

 

 IIIB-IIIC

237

141 (59.5%)

53 (22.4%)

43 (18.1%)

 

Bormann type

    

0.475

 Bor 1–2

160

107 (66.9%)

34 (21.3%)

19 (11.9%)

 

 Bor 3–4

677

465 (68.7%)

118 (17.4%)

94 (13.9%)

 
  1. NSR: Nosplenic hilar orsplenic arteryLN resection, CR: combination resectionof the stomach and spleen or spleen-co-pancreas, SPR: spleen-preserved No. 10/11 LNs removal