Skip to main content

Table 2 Difference in clinicopathological features due to calcium channel blockersa

From: Verification of the effects of calcium channel blockers on the immune microenvironment of breast cancer

Parameters

All case (n = 338)

TNBC (n = 105)

HER2BC (n = 78)

Calcium channel blockers

p value

Calcium channel blockers

p value

Calcium channel blockers

p value

No (n = 297)

Yes (n = 41)

No (n = 94)

Yes (n = 11)

No (n = 68)

Yes (n = 10)

Age (years old)

 ≤ 55

170 (57.2%)

7 (17.1%)

< 0.001

59 (62.8%)

2 (18.2%)

0.004

27 (39.7%)

2 (20.0%)

0.234

 > 55

127 (42.8%)

34 (82.9%)

35 (37.2%)

9 (81.8%)

41 (60.3%)

8 (80.0%)

Tumor size (mm)

 ≤ 50

258 (86.9%)

36 (87.8%)

0.868

82 (87.2%)

8 (72.7%)

0.197

60 (88.2%)

10 (100.0%)

0.258

 > 50

39 (13.1%)

5 (12.2%)

12 (12.8%)

3 (27.3%)

8 (11.8%)

0 (0.0%)

Skin infiltration

 Negative

255 (85.9%)

33 (80.5%)

0.365

86 (91.5%)

8 (72.7%)

0.055

58 (85.3%)

9 (90.0%)

0.694

 Positive

42 (14.1%)

8 (19.5%)

8 (8.5%)

3 (27.3%)

10 (14.7%)

1 (10.0%)

Lymph node status

 Negative

102 (34.3%)

12 (29.3%)

0.887

28 (29.8%)

4 (36.4%)

0.658

28 (41.2%)

4 (40.0%)

0.945

 Positive

195 (65.7%)

29 (70.7%)

66 (70.2%)

7 (63.6%)

40 (58.8%)

6 (60.0%)

Estrogen receptor

 Negative

166 (55.9%)

21 (51.2%)

 

–

–

–

–

–

–

 Positive

131 (44.1%)

20 (48.8%)

0.574

–

–

–

–

Progesterone receptor

 Negative

207 (69.7%)

29 (70.7%)

0.893

–

–

–

–

–

–

 Positive

90 (30.3%)

12 (29.3%)

–

–

–

–

HER2

 Negative

190 (64.0%)

24 (58.5%)

0.500

–

–

 

–

–

–

 Positive

107 (36.0%)

17 (41.5%)

–

–

–

–

Ki67

 ≤ 15%

87 (29.3%)

18 (43.9%)

0.058

16 (17.0%)

2 (18.2%)

0.924

15 (22.1%)

5 (50.0%)

0.060

 > 15%

210 (70.7%)

23 (56.1%)

78 (83.0%)

9 (81.8%)

53 (77.9%)

5 (50.0%)

Intrinsic subtype Luminal BC

 HER2BC, TNBC

162 (54.5%)

21 51.2%)

0.690

–

–

 

–

–

–

 Luminal BC

135 (45.5%)

20 (48.8%)

–

–

–

–

Intrinsic subtype HER2BC

 Luminal BC, TNBC

229 (77.1%)

31 (75.6%)

0.832

–

–

 

–

–

–

 HER2BC

68 (22.9%)

10 (24.4%)

–

–

–

–

Intrinsic subtype TNBC

 Luminal BC, HER2BC

203 (68.4%)

30 (73.2%)

0.5332

–

–

 

–

–

–

 TNBC

94 (31.6%)

11 (26.8%)

–

–

–

–

Objective response rate

 Non-Responders

32 (10.8%)

8 (19.5%)

0.105

12 (12.8%)

4 (36.4%)

0.040

5 (7.4%)

0 (0.0%)

0.382

 Responders

265 (89.2%)

33 (80.5%)

82 (87.2%)

7 (63.6%)

63 (92.6%)

10 (100.0%)

Pathological response

 Non-pCR

195 (65.7%)

27 (65.9%)

0.980

53 (56.4%)

7 (63.6%)

0.649

33 (48.5%)

2 (20.0%)

0.093

 pCR

102 (34.3%)

14 (34.1%)

41 (43.6%)

4 (36.4%)

35 (51.5%)

8 (80.0%)

TILs

 Low

152 (51.2%)

28 (68.3%)

0.040

38 (40.4%)

9 (81.8%)

0.009

22 (32.4%)

3 (30.0%)

0.884

 High

145 (48.8%)

13 (31.7%)

56 (59.6%)

2 (18.2%)

46 (67.6%)

7 (70.0%)

Hypertension

 No

273 (91.9%)

0 (0.0%)

< 0.001

90 (95.7%)

0 (0.0%)

< 0.001

60 (88.2%)

0 (0.0%)

< 0.001

 Yes

24 (8.1%)

41 (100.0%)

4 (4.3%)

11 (100.0%)

8 (11.8%)

10 (100.0%)

Multiple types of AHT

 No

293 (98.6%)

21 (51.2%)

< 0.001

93 (98.9%)

6 (54.5%)

< 0.001

67 (98.5%)

4 (40.0%)

< 0.001

 Yes

4 (1.4%)

20 (48.8%)

1 (1.1%)

5 (45.5%)

1 (1.5%)

6 (60.0%)

ACEi or ARBs

 No

281 (94.6%)

24 (58.5%)

< 0.001

91 (96.8%)

8 (72.7%)

0.001

62 (91.2%)

4 (40.0%)

< 0.001

 Yes

16 (5.4%)

17 (41.5%)

3 (3.2%)

3 (27.3%)

6 (8.8%)

6 (60.0%)

Beta-blockers

 No

289 (97.3%)

37 (90.2%)

0.022

93 (98.9%)

3 (27.3%)

< 0.001

66 (97.1%)

10 (100.0%)

0.589

 Yes

8 (2.7%)

4 (9.8%)

1 (1.1%)

8 (72.7%)

2 (2.9%)

0 (0.0%)

Diuretics

 No

293 (98.6%)

38 (92.7%)

0.012

93 (98.9%)

10 (90.9%)

0.066

67 (98.5%)

10 (100.0%)

0.704

 Yes

4 (1.4%)

3 (7.3%)

1 (1.1%)

1 (9.1%)

1 (1.5%)

0 (0.0%)

  1. HER human epidermal growth factor receptor, Luminal BC luminal breast cancer, HER2BC human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-enriched breast cancer, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, pCR pathological complete response, TILs tumor- infiltrating lymphocytes, AHT antihypertensive drug, ACEi angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, ARBs angiotensin II receptor blockers
  2. aCorrelations between the two groups were examined in chi-squared tests