Table 3 Sensitivity Analysis
SNV (ABC) | Author(Study) | Year | Sensitivity | Heterogeneity (I2, p value) | Specificity | Heterogeneity (I2, p value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|  | Board RE.2010(2) | 2010 | 0.774(0.715–0.818) | 40.6%, 0.021 | 0.894(0.871–0.923) | 53.1%, 0.001 |
Chung.JH.2017 | 2017 | 0.772(0.720–0.819) | 38.3%, 0.031 | 0.898(0.876–0.922) | 55.4%, 0.001 | |
Chung.JH.2017(2) | 2017 | 0.771(0.719–0.818) | 36.4%, 0.035 | 0.905(0.878–0.927) | 54.9%, 0.001 | |
Chung.JH.2017(3) | 2017 | 0.774(0.716–0.818) | 40.6%, 0.024 | 0.906(0.880–0.929) | 53.4%, 0.000 | |
Dawson SJ.2013 | 2013 | 0.770(0.717–0.817) | 38.9%, 0.028 | 0.895(0.867–0.919) | 51.3%, 0.002 | |
Dawson SJ.2013(2) | 2013 | 0.760(0.704–0.810) | 34.0%, 0.054 | 0.896(0.88–0.920) | 52.6%, 0.001 | |
Frenel JS.2015 | 2015 | 0.773(0.721–0.818) | 39.8%, 0.024 | 0.898(0.870–0.922) | 54.2%, 0.001 | |
Frenel JS.2015(2) | 2015 | 0.777(0.724–0.823) | 40.1%, 0.031 | 0.899(0.871–0.922) | 55.2%, 0.000 | |
Garcia-Saenz JA.2015 | 2015 | 0.773(0.719–0.821) | 39.4%, 0.026 | 0.896(0.876–0.926) | 59.5%, 0.000 | |
Garcia-Saenz JA.2015(2) | 2015 | 0.780(0.728–0.827) | 36.4%, 0.040 | 0.897(0.869–0.922) | 55.2%, 0.000 | |
Higgins MJ.2011 | 2011 | 0.777(0.722–0.825) | 37.4%, 0.034 | 0.902(0.875–0.925) | 59.5%, 0.000 | |
Higgins MJ.2012 | 2012 | 0.763(0.709–0.808) | 25.2%, 0.129 | 0.914(0.892–0.939) | 43.9%, 0.012 | |
Janku. F.2015 | 2015 | 0.780(0.726–0.825) | 39.0%, 0.027 | 0.912(0.886–0.934) | 42.7%, 0.001 | |
Liang DH.2016 | 2016 | 0.770(0.717–0.815) | 38.8%, 0.028 | 0.896(0.865–0.926) | 55.1%, 0.000 | |
Liang DH.2016(2) | 2016 | 0.777(0.719–0.821) | 39.4%, 0.026 | 0.897(0.875–0.925) | 55.4%, 0.000 | |
Madic.J.2015 | 2015 | 0.787(0.729–0.831) | 32.3%, 0.066 | 0.899(0.871–0.926) | 55.4%, 0.000 | |
Nakauchi.C.2016 | 2016 | 0.771(0.717–0.820) | 39.5%, 0.025 | 0.900(0.872–0.923) | 55.0%, 0.001 | |
Nakauchi.C.2016(2) | 2016 | 0.775(0.717–0.819) | 39.9%, 0.024 | 0.904(0.877–0.927) | 55.1%, 0.000 | |
Rothe F.2014 | 2014 | 0.777(0.719–0.821) | 39.4%, 0.026 | 0.899(0.871–0.926) | 55.4%, 0.001 | |
Rothe F.2014(2) | 2014 | 0.777(0.719–0.821) | 39.4%, 0.026 | 0.898(0.875–0.925) | 55.1%, 0.001 | |
Schiavon.G.2015 | 2015 | 0.773(0.721–0.820) | 40.5%, 0.022 | 0.896(0.867–0.920) | 52.2%, 0.000 | |
Sefrioui.D.2015 | 2015 | 0.775(0.723–0.821) | 40.7%, 0.021 | 0.894(0.85–0.918) | 49.6%, 0.003 | |
Spoerke J.2016 | 2016 | 0.779(0.727–0.826) | 38.6%, 0.034 | 0.896(0.874–0.924) | 52.6%, 0.001 | |
Takeshita.T.2017 | 2017 | 0.787(0.712–0.825) | 19.3%, 0.021 | 0.901(0.867–0.927) | 55.3%, 0.001 | |
Kodahl AR.2018 | 2018 | 0.769(0.715–0.818) | 39.8%, 0.024 | 0.898(0.878–0.928) | 54.4%, 0.001 | |
CNV | Author(Study) | Year | Sensitivity | Heterogeneity (I2, p value) | Specificity | Heterogeneity (I2, p value) |
|  | Chung.JH.2017(4) | 2017 | 0.474(0.244–0.711) | 0.00%, 0.499 | 0.966(0.883–0.996) | 29.6%, 0.235 |
Chung.JH.2017(5) | 2017 | 0.391(0.197–0.615) | 0.00%, 0.600 | 0.964(0.875–0.996) | 24.5%, 0.264 | |
Liang DH.2016(3) | 2016 | 0.381(0.181–0.616) | 0.00%, 0.422 | 0.958(0.857–0.995) | 12.3%, 0.331 | |
Liang DH.2016(4) | 2016 | 0.409(0.207–0.636) | 17.1%, 0.305 | 1.000(0.925–1.000) | 0.00%, 1.000 | |
Page.K.2011 | 2011 | 0.455(0.167–0.766) | 15.8%, 0.210 | 0.968(0.890–0.996) | 33.7%, 0.210 |