Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics after matching

From: RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis

Characteristic

MIILE (n = 216)

Sweet (n = 216)

p value

Age, year

61(56~68)

61.46 ± 8.03

0.629

Gender, n (%)

  

0.593

 Male

181(83.8)

185(85.6)

 

 Female

35(16.2)

31(14.4)

 

BMI (kg/m2)

21.46 (19.26~23.04)

21.09 (18.86~23.52)

0.637

CCI, n(%)

  

0.808

 2

9(4.2)

13(6.0)

 

 3

46(21.3)

48(22.2)

 

 4

80(37.0)

84(38.9)

 

 5

60(27.8)

54(25.0)

 

 6

21(9.7)

17(7.9)

 

 7

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

 

Tumor length (cm)

4.0(3.0~5.0)

3.5(3.0~4.5)

0.178

Tumor locationa, n(%)

  

0.974

 Upper and middle junction

11(5.1)

10(4.6)

 

 Middle

99(45.8)

100(46.3)

 

 Lower

106(49.1)

106(49.1)

 

Tumor stageb, n(%)

  

0.594

 1

46(21.3)

42(19.4)

 

 2

28(13.0)

34(15.8)

 

 3

136(63.0)

130(60.2)

 

 T4

6(2.7)

10(4.6)

 

Nodal stageb, n(%)

  

0.675

 0

107(49.5)

115(53.2)

 

 1

51(23.6)

54(25.0)

 

 2

33(15.3)

27(12.5)

 

 N3

25(11.6)

20(9.3)

 

Pathologic stageb, n(%)

  

0.794

 I

50(23.1)

53(24.5)

 

 II

68(31.5)

72(33.3)

 

 III

98(45.4)

91(42.2)

 

Adjuvant therapy, n(%)

  

0.962

 None

118(54.6)

123(56.9)

 

 Chemotherapy

26(12.0)

24(11.1)

 

 Chemoradiotherapy

44(20.4)

41(19.0)

 

 Radiaotherapy

28(13.0)

28 (13.0)

 
  1. a,bThe classification of tumor pathology and location was based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th ed. MIILE = Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy;
  2. BMI Body mass index, CCI Charlson comorbidity index