Skip to main content

Table 4 Most important cancer service gaps

From: Coverage of cancer services in Australia and providers’ views on service gaps: findings from a national cross-sectional survey

 

Major Cities a

Regional

Remote

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

  

OR

(95% CI)

OR

(95% CI)

 

(95% CI)

Survivorship/Supportive Care a

41

61.2%

30

50.0%

29

39.2%

100

49.6%

 Weighted count b

33

56.9%

33

51.6%

30

38.7%

95

47.9%

     

(43.6–57.4%)

Specialist Oncology Services

4

6.0%

9

15.0%

21

28.4%

33

16.4%

 Weighted count b

2

3.4%

7

10.9%

22

28.8%

32

16.1%

   

2.67

(0.74–9.65)

6.16**

(1.87–20.23)

 

(11.9–22.2%)

Palliative Care/Hospice

9

13.4%

15

25.0%

9

12.2%

33

16.4%

 Weighted count b

9

15.5%

15

23.4%

10

13.0%

33

16.7%

   

2.18

(0.82–5.09)

1.40

(0.48–4.07)

 

(11.9–22.2%)

General Cance Service Resources

10

14.9%

6

10.0%

15

20.3%

32

15.9%

 Weighted count b

14

24.1%

9

14.1%

15

19.5%

38

19.4%

   

0.80

(0.26–2.50)

1.98

(0.76–5.20)

 

(11.5–21.6%)

Total

67

100%

60

100%

74

100%

201

100%

  1. **p = 0.003; a reference categories for multinomial logistic regression of service gaps (excluding none) and remoteness (major cities, rural, remote), [19] after adjusting for respondent’s role and cancer service ownership; b count weighted by number of respondents per Primary Health Network region: missing responses n = 77