Skip to main content

Table 6 Functional scales in maintenance therapy arms 1–3, and arms 2+3 versus control arm 5

From: A new promising way of maintenance therapy in advanced ovarian cancer: a comparative clinical study

Characteristic Arm 1
(n = 46)
Arm 2
(n = 76)
Arm 3
(n = 42)
Arms 2+3
(n = 118)
Arm 5
(n = 80)
At screening
 MS ± SD 81.23 ± 4.42 82.05 ± 4.62 82.18 ± 4.62 82.09 ± 4.60 81.87 ± 5.16
p* 0.4464 0.8218 0.7500 0.7516  
After combined treatment
 MS ± SD 66.49 ± 5.10 67.51 ± 4.78 66.95 ± 4.84 67.32 ± 4.79 67.15 ± 4.92
p* 0.4440 0.6504 0.8337 0.8202  
At the end of the study
 MS ± SD 50.90 ± 9.74 55.04 ± 6.68 53.41 ± 7.39 54.41 ± 6.96 48.10 ± 6.09
p* 0.2122 < 0.0001 0.0055 0.0001  
  1. MS mean score, SD standard deviation
  2. *Student’s test was applied to determine the differences between arms 1–3 vs arm 5 and arms 2+3 vs arm 5
  3. NOTE. Bold font indicates p < 0.05
\