Peer Review reports
From: Moving targets in 4D-CTs versus MIP and AIP: comparison of patients data to phantom data
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Mar 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Apr 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Panagiotis Balermpas |
| 24 Apr 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antonella Fogliata |
| 27 May 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Kai Joachim Borm |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 27 May 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Jun 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Panagiotis Balermpas |
| 12 Jun 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Kai Joachim Borm |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 Jun 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 26 Jun 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Kai Joachim Borm |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 26 Jun 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Jun 2018 | Editorially accepted | |
| 24 Jul 2018 | Article published | 10.1186/s12885-018-4647-4 |
You can find further information about peer review here.