Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of results of RCTs included in subgroup analysis

From: Low level laser therapy (Photobiomodulation therapy) for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review

Studies

Limb circumference/volume

Pain intensity

Range of motion

Immediately after end of all sessions

Short-term follow-up

(< 6 months)

Immediately after end of all sessions

Short-term follow-up

(< 6 months)

Immediately after end of all sessions

Short-term follow-up

(< 6 months)

LLLT (PBM) vs. sham laser

Omar et al. 2011 [48]

+

+

NR

NR

+

NR

Kaviani et al. 2006 [47]

NR

+*

NR

+

NR

–

Carati et al. 2003 [46]

–

+*

NR

NR

–

–

LLLT (PBM) vs. conventional therapy

Ridner et al. 2013 [49]

–

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Kozanoglu et al. 2009 [50]

+

–

–

–

NR

NR

Maiya et al. 2008 [51]

+

NR

+

NR

NR

NR

LLLT (PBM) vs. a waiting list control

Lau and Cheing 2009 [52]

–

+

NR

NR

NR

NR

  1. +: LLLT was more effective than the control group; −: LLLT was not more effective than the control group; *comparison at 1 month post treatment
  2. LLLT low level laser therapy, PBM photobiomodulation, NR not reported