Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of patient outcomes in 5 studies comparing LP and TL in advanced laryngeal tumors

From: A change in the study evaluation paradigm reveals that larynx preservation compromises survival in T4 laryngeal cancer patients

Study

T4 patients assigned to conservative treatment arm

T4 patients eventually treated by primary CRT or RT

Comments

VALCSG [4, 14]

43

Unclear,

19 < N < 43

59 TL in 116 T1-T4 patients in the conservative treatment arm, 30 upfront

24 TL (upfront + salvage) in 43 T4 patients

TL in T4: 56%

TL in T1–3: 29%

T4 had 5.6-fold lower probability to achieve response to ICT

T4 had 7.1-fold poorer organ preservation rate than T1–3

EORTC [1]

4

0

No T4 patient in the chemo arm eventually received conservative treatment, i.e. upfront TL followed by RT was the treatment for all T4 patients in the surgery as well as in the chemo arm

GETTEC [15]

0

0

Only T3 patients were included

TL in 58% of patients of ICT arm

OS after CRT significantly poorer than after surgery (p = 0.006)

Bhalavat [16]

2

2

1 local recurrence after partial remission

1 survived for 5 years

RTOG 91–11

[2, 8, 17, 18]

18 ICRT

17 CCRT

16 RT

Unclear

No T4 tumor with penetration through the cartilage, cartilage at the most minimally eroded

7 upfront TL in ICRT

No data given about T category

No differential data given for T4