Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The cost-effectiveness of active surveillance compared to watchful waiting and radical prostatectomy for low risk localised prostate cancer

Original Submission
11 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Takafumi Katayama
24 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Chung
5 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Chunhuan Lao
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Chunhuan Lao
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Chunhuan Lao
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Chunhuan Lao
Resubmission - Version 5
8 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
22 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Chunhuan Lao
Resubmission - Version 6
22 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
1 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
8 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3522-z

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page