Skip to main content

Table 1 Correlation of RCE1 and p-p38 protein expression with clinicopathological parameters

From: Reduced RCE1 expression predicts poor prognosis of colorectal carcinoma

Characteristics

n

RCE1

P-value

P-p38

P-value

Low

High

Low

High

Gender

 Female

96

36 (37.5%)

60 (62.5%)

0.113

43 (44.8%)

53 (55.2%)

0.190

 Male

148

72 (48.6%)

76 (51.4%)

80 (54.1%)

68 (45.9%)

Age (y)

  > 60

105

40 (38.1%)

65 (61.9%)

0.118

51 (48.6%)

54 (51.4%)

0.698

  ≤ 60

139

68 (48.9%)

71 (51.1%)

72 (51.8%)

67 (48.2%)

CEA (ng/ml)

  > 5

116

63 (54.3%)

53 (45.7%)

0.003

67 (58.0%)

49 (42.0%)

0.030

  ≤ 5

128

45 (35.2%)

83 (64.8%)

56 (43.8%)

72 (56.2%)

CA19–9 (U/ml)

  > 37

59

30 (50.8%)

29 (49.2%)

0.107

30 (50.8%)

29 (49.2%)

0.021

  ≤ 37

185

78 (42.2%)

107 (57.8%)

93 (50.3%)

92 (49.7%)

Location

 colon

121

56 (46.3%)

65 (53.7%)

0.797

64 (52.9%)

57 (47.1%)

1.000

 Rectum

123

51 (41.5%)

71 (58.5%)

59 (48.0%)

64 (52.0%)

Depth of invasion

 T1/T2

58

15 (25.9%)

43 (74.1%)

0.001

18 (31.0%)

40 (69.0%)

0.001

 T3/T4

186

93 (48.7%)

93 (51.3%)

105 (56.5%)

81 (43.5%)

Histological grade

 I/II

214

95 (44.4%)

119 (55.6%)

1.000

108 (50.5%)

106(49.5%)

1.000

 III

30

13 (43.3%)

17 (56.7%)

15 (50%)

15(50%)

Node stage

 N0

156

58 (37.2%)

98 (62.8%)

0.000

79 (50.6%)

77 (49.4%)

0.790

 N1

59

26 (44.1%)

33 (55.9%)

28 (47.5%)

31 (52.5%)

 N2

29

24 (82.8%)

5 (17.2%)

16 (55.2%)

13 (44.8%)

TNM stage

 I

48

11 (22.9%)

37 (77.1%)

0.001

17 (35.4%)

37 (64.6%)

0.04

 II

108

48 (44.4%)

60 (55.6%)

62 (57.4%)

46 (42.6%)

 III

88

49 (56.7%)

39 (43.3%)

44 (50%)

44 (50%)

  1. Bold values ( p < 0.05) indicate statistical significance