Skip to main content

Table 2 Neuroendocrine breast carcinomas compared to the prospective set of ductal carcinomas

From: Primary neuroendocrine breast carcinomas are associated with poor local control despite favourable biological profile: a retrospective clinical study

 

NEBC (n = 39)

Ductal carcinomas (n = 506)

p-value

Median age at diagnosis

66.0

57.0

<0.0005

T class

  

0.40

 T1

28 (71.8%)

322 (63.6%)

 

 T2

9 (23.1%)

167 (33.0%)

 

 T3

2 (5.1%)

12 (2.4%)

 

 T4

0 (0.0%)

5 (1.0%)

 

N class

  

0.72

 N0

23 (59.0%)

314 (62.1%)

 

 N1

10 (25.6%)

149 (29.4%)

 

 N2

5 (12.8%)

41 (8.1%)

 

 N3

0 (0.0%)

2 (0.4%)

 

Missing

1 (2.6%)

0 (0.0%)

 

HER2 expression

  

0.046

 Negative

37 (94.9%)

437 (86.4%)

 

 Positive

1 (2.6%)

69 (13.6%)

 

 Missing

1 (2.6%)

0 (0.0%)

 

Estrogen receptor expression

  

0.0062

 Negative

1 (2.6%)

103 (20.4%)

 

 Low

0 (0.0%)

18 (3.6%)

 

 Moderate

0 (0.0%)

25 (4.9%)

 

 High

37 (94.9%)

360 (71.1%)

 

 Missing

1 (2.6%)

0 (0.0%)

 

Progesterone receptor expression

  

0.088

 Negative

4 (10.3%)

148 (29.2%)

 

 Low

4 (10.3%)

61 (12.1%)

 

 Moderate

5 (12.8%)

57 (11.3%)

 

 High

25 (61.5%)

240 (47.4%)

 

 Missing

2 (5.1%)

0 (0.0%)

 

Ki-67

  

0.060

 Negative

0 (0.0%)

32 (6.3%)

 

 Low

14 (35.9%)

217 (43.1%)

 

 Moderate

15 (38.5%)

116 (23.0%)

 

 High

8 (20.5%)

139 (27.6%)

 

 Missing

2 (5.1%)

2 (0.4%)

 

Adjuvant radiotherapy

  

0.23

 No

8 (20.5%)

66 (13.4%)

 

 Yes

31 (79.5%)

427 (86.6%)

 

Adjuvant chemotherapy

  

0.00070

 No

27 (69.2%)

207 (40.2%)

 

 Yes

12 (30.8%)

299 (59.1%)

 

Adjuvant endocrine therapy

  

0.015

 No

7 (17.9%)

191 (37.7%)

 

 Yes

32 (82.1%)

315 (62.3%)

 
  1. Legend 2. Prognostic factors and adjuvant treatments of neuroendocrine breast carcinomas (NEBC) compared to the prospective set of ductal carcinomas. Primary metastasized cancers have been excluded. Missing values have not been included to the analysis