Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of the participating patients

From: Predictive value of vrk 1 and 2 for rectal adenocarcinoma response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: a retrospective observational cohort study

Variables (N = 67)

 

Age, years, median (IQR)

72 (63; 77)

Gender

 

 Male

43 (64.2 %)

 Female

24 (35.8 %)

ECOG performance status

 

 0

38 (56.7 %)

  ≥ 1

29 (43.3 %)

Tumor invasion depth

 

 T1

1 (1.5 %)

 T2

9 (13.4 %)

 T3

53 (79.1 %)

 T4

4 (6 %)

Lymph node metastases

 

 N0

13 (19.4 %)

 N+

54 (80.6 %)

Grade of differentiation (N = 60)

 

 Low grade

17 (28.3 %)

 Moderate-High grade

43 (71.7 %)

LVI (N = 63)

 

 Yes

6 (9.5 %)

 No

57 (90.4 %)

Tumor size, cm, median (IQR)

5 (4; 6)

Anal verge distance, cm, median (IQR)

8 (5; 10)

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

 

 RDT- Flouropyrimidines

54 (80.6 %)

 RDT- Flouropyrimidines - Oxaliplatin

13 (19.4 %)

T downstaging

 

 Yes

36 (53.7 %)

 No

31 (46.3 %)

Tumor Regression Grading

 

 TRG 0 - 1

31 (46.3 %)

 TRG 2 - 3

36 (53.7 %)

Responder

 

 Yes

45 (67.2 %)

 No

22 (32.8 %)

  1. Abbreviations: ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, RDT radiotherapy, TRG tumor regression grading, LVI lymphovascular invasion, IQR Interquartile Range, reported as quartile 1st and 3th, respectively