Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of breast cancer studies from East Africa

From: Aggressive breast cancer in western Kenya has early onset, high proliferation, and immune cell infiltration

Study

Country

City

Patients with Breast Cancer

Retrospective or prospective study design

Female

Male

Ethnic groups considered in study

Immune cells quantified

Median

Mean

ER+

ER-

ER+

ER-

PR+

PR-

PR+

PR-

HER2+

HER2-

HER2+

HER2-

TN

TN

Time Period of Sample Collection

Date of Publication

(N)#

(%)

(%)

age

age

(N)

(N)

(%)

(%)

(N)

(N)

(%)

(%)

(N)

(N)

(%)

(%)

(N)

(%)

This Study, Sawe et al.

Kenya

Eldoret

48 (68)A

Prospective

93

7

Yes

CD68, CD163, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD25

48.5

51.9

29

20

59

41

19

29

40

60

7

42

14

86

16

33

2011–2013

 

Nalwoga et al.

Uganda

Kampala

65B

Retrospective

100

no B

No

None

 

49.8

23

42

35

65

15

50

23

77

19

46

29

71

 

34 G

1993–2002

2007

Roy et al.

Uganda

Kampala

35 (45)B,C

Retrospective

96

4 C,B

No

None

  

27

18

60

40

    

5

39

11

89

16

36

2000–2004

2011

Bird et al.

Kenya

Kijabe

34 (129)D

Prospective

97

3

No

None

47

48

29

 

24

     

9

25

26

74

15

44

2001–2007

2008

Nyagol et al.

Kenya

Nairobi

158B

Prospective

100

no B

No

None

 

47

59

99

37

63

77

81

49

51

44

114

28

72

44

28

2002–2004

2006

Wata et al.

Kenya

Nairobi

54 (219)B,E

Retrospective

100

no B

No

WBC, platelets

45

46.5

30

34

47

53

28

36

44

56

19

35

35

65

  

2007–2008

2013

Kantelhardt et al.

Ethiopia

Addis Ababa

352B

Retrospective

100

no B

No

None

 

40.1-43H

230

122

65

35

176

168

51

49

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

  

2005–2010

2014

Burson et al.

Tanzania

Dar es Salaam

57 (488)I

Retrospective

97

3

No

None

 

49.4

33

32

51

49

29

36

45

55

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

  

2009–2010

2010

  1. ER estrogen receptor, PR progesterone receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor, TN triple negative (ER-,PR-,HER2-), N number, % = percent, n.d not determined
  2. #The number before the parentheses is the number of patients used for analysis of receptor status and is summarized individually by the indicated superscripts
  3. The number in parentheses represents the total number of patients with breast cancer in the study.
  4. A N = 48 patients with PR and triple negative data. N = 49 with ER, HER2 data. Excluded patients who did not provide consent or who had chemotherapy prior to surgery
  5. BOnly females included in study
  6. C N = 35 patients with triple negative data. N = 44 patients with HER2 data. 2 of 47 (4 %) patients were male but were excluded from the study
  7. D N = 34 patients with HER2/triple negative data. 120 patients with hormone receptor data
  8. E N = 54 patients with HER2 data. N = 64 patients with ER data. N = 64 for PR. Excluded if <18 yrs old, male, or if chart did not have a date of diagnosis
  9. FNo hormonal receptor data in this study
  10. GDefined in this study by staining for Cytokeratin 5/6 and P-Cadherin as basal subtype markers, rather than ER, PR, and HER2
  11. HMean is 43 years old for ER+ and 40.1 years old for ER- patients
  12. I N = 57 patients with ER and PR data. No HER2 data for these patients